• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Breaking Out of the Status Quo

The $110 Billion Treasure Trove For Nonprofits

Take a football field.  Cover it to a depth of nine inches (actually, about 9.14 inches, if my math is correct) with $100 bills. That’s $110 billion.  That’s how much money is held in donor-advised funds (DAFs) in the United States right now.  These funds are earmarked to go to a charity like yours.  And the […]

Learn More May 30, 2019

The two common threads of mid, major, monthly, and planning giving donors

As we’ve discussed, major donors are not born.  They are neither spontaneously generated nor conceived, immaculately or otherwise. Rather, they come from your existing donor file and supporter rolls.  And they exist at the intersection of high commitment to your cause, high ability to give, and high desire to give with a large gift. Neither […]

Learn More May 3, 2019

Don’t Worry – Rich People Are Here To Save Us

…at least for now. A couple weeks ago, Roger talked about Blackbaud’s report on 2018 giving that found a 1.5% increase in giving in 2018.  He mentioned that we wouldn’t know more details until Fundraising Effectiveness Project (FEP) released their data.  Well, guess what just happened!  It’s up here. A word of warning: even though […]

Learn More March 6, 2019

Year-end Results: More Answers to “What Happened?”

Back in January, Roger cited M+R’s “What the Heck Just Happened?” post about subpar year-end results.  Now, M+R is back with answers in a preview of their always helpful benchmarks.  The full post is up here and is well worth a read.  Some answers to our burning questions: Did the tax law change mess things […]

Learn More March 4, 2019

Popular Posts in 2018: Direct Mail Not Yet Dead

Editor’s Note:  Between Christmas and January 7th The Agitator Global HQ is undergoing some renovation and renewal.  The bowling alley is being resurfaced which, in turn, produces a tornado of dust requiring a thorough cleaning of the library collection not to mention the work space of our poet-in-residence. Consequently, we’ve decided to use this period of renovation and renewal to repeat 5 of our most popular posts of 2018. If you’ve already etched these gems in your mind we hope you’ll share them with colleagues. And, as importantly, we urge you to send along any suggestions for […]

Learn More December 26, 2018

Sorry Santa, We’re Closed!

I never fail to marvel at the bizarre behavior of many nonprofits when it comes to year-end giving. Let me explain. For almost every charity the period between Christmas and New Year’s is a heavy period for giving. For some groups as much as 25% of their annual revenue arrives in those final weeks. Many donors—particularly […]

Learn More December 17, 2018

Bumper Crop for #GivingTuesday. Crop. Picture of the Larger Harvest Mixed.

First, a quick summary of 2018 #GivingTuesday results (as of 11/29/18):   Biggest #GivingTuesday ever raised $380 million in the U.S. 6 million donations were made with mean gift size of $105.55 Facebook users, some using livestream Facebook video gaming, raised over $125 million; that’s $45 million more than last year. Blackbaud reported that its systems […]

Learn More November 30, 2018

Year End: Ideal Asking Amounts

Do you really know the best “ask amount” for each donor? Many fundraisers really don’t know.  They guess, or resort to traditional, tribal wisdom ask strings like 1X Highest Previous Gift (HPC), 1.5 X HPC,  2 X HPC and Other $_______ The result?  They’re often leaving massive amounts of money on the table. The ask […]

Learn More August 30, 2018

Are You Missing the Golden Middle?

In 1987 I launched a series of highly successful mid-level giving programs and for years wondered why others weren’t doing the same.  So, when Tom and I started The Agitator we began ranting on the subject, urging folks to get on board. For example, hereand  here. And so did others like Mark Phillips of BlueFrog with […]

Learn More June 4, 2018

What You Need to Know from the 2018 Fundraising Effectiveness Project: Implications

The 2018 FEP report has both silver lining and cloud. Now what?  I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments; here are a few of mine. We must rebuild our base.  Increasing retention post-first gift is a major part of this and we should pat ourselves on the back (not too hard) for this. […]

Learn More April 27, 2018

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 … 14 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!