• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Have You Used Online Video Lately?

According to a new report from Pew Internet Research, 71% of online adults use video-sharing sites … indeed, when asked, 28% said they had viewed such a site “yesterday”. That number jumps to 47% in the age 18-29 cohort. That’s a heap of online video watching. And there’s plenty of fresh material to watch … […]

Learn More July 29, 2011

Smart Phones, Social Nets & E-readers

Pew Research has issued three reports this past  month on Americans’ use of new communications tools and platforms. Here’s an excellent chance to catch up with the kind of media choices your donors are making. Smartphone Adoption and Usage 35% of all US adults have a smartphone. The biggest users — those with income of […]

Learn More July 26, 2011

Good Update On Mobile Giving

Mark Phillips at Bluefrog has done us a service with this update on mobile giving, with a UK slant. He links to a presentation from JustGiving.com indicating that 20% of UK charities are using mobile fundraising in some fashion. JustGiving itself receives almost 24,000 visits a day from mobile devices, up 82% in 2011 alone […]

Learn More July 18, 2011

Different Shapes And Sizes

When I read the comments Agitator readers make on our posts, I realize the huge diversity of our readership. I just finished ‘moderating’ two recent comments that indicate the huge spread in reader interest and focus. Both are brief, so I’ll re-publish here to underscore a point. Comment #1 from Kristen Smith at People For […]

Learn More June 14, 2011

Twitter Update From Pew

I’m alerting you to this report reluctantly, because I’m a Twitter avoider. But Pew Research says 13% of online Americans — 19% in the biggest using 25-34 year-old cohort — now use the service, so I guess it’s my duty. Usage goes up with education! UGH! Tom

Learn More June 13, 2011

The Social Habit

The Social Habit is a study of social media usage by Edison Research and Arbitron. Some interesting findings … 52% of Americans 12+ have a profile on one or more social networks. This figure is driven largely by Facebook, which is now used by over half (51%) of Americans 12+. Twitter is as familiar to […]

Learn More June 10, 2011

State Of Mobile Fundraising & Engagement

On May 19th my colleague Kevin Schulman and I will host a session titled “What’s Next in Mobile” as part of  the Fundraising Success Virtual Conference and Expo. In preparation for that session, I wanted to first determine “What’s Happening Right Now in Mobile?”  The answer is somewhat unsettling when it comes to the nonprofit […]

Learn More May 9, 2011

Students Use Online Advocacy

Harvard’s Institute of Politics has collected some interesting data on college-age and young adults and their online advocacy. As reported in ClickZ Marketing News … “Among 18- to 29-year-old Facebook users, 21 percent said they’ve used Facebook to advocate for a political position, 29 percent have liked an issue, and 24 percent have liked a […]

Learn More April 6, 2011

Email, Keep Your Chin Up

New email stats from digital metrics firm comScore indicate a shift is underway, as traffic to web-based email services declined 6%, while the number of consumers accessing their email via mobile devices increased 36%. I’m not sure this increase in mobile access is good news for online fundraisers, because I just can’t see donors making […]

Learn More February 10, 2011

Generations Online 2010

More good stuff from Pew Internet Research you might have missed over the holidays. Here’s their latest report, Generations Online 2010, comparing the online behavior and internet use of Americans across generations. In what they term the “biggest online trend” Pew reports that certain key internet activities — including donating — are becoming more uniformly […]

Learn More January 21, 2011

<< 1 … 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 … 27 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!