• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Twittering Away

Pew Internet Research has reported some interesting  new data on Twitter usage, which triggered this set of commenting articles … worthwhile reading. Bottomline: 8% of online Americans say they’ve used Twitter. But 41% say they ‘hardly ever’ use their account. For more sense of proportion, Twitter’s 15 million users compare to Facebook’s 151 million unique […]

Learn More December 10, 2010

Comfort For Direct Mail Fundraisers

DirectMarketingIQ offers this article reporting on an Epsilon study of consumer preferences (in US and Canada) for various marketing channels. Direct mail comes though with flying colors. The most important reason seems to be that consumers trust information in the mail more than online. Says Epsilon: “Consumers stated loud and clear that information is more […]

Learn More November 19, 2010

More On Mobile For Nonprofits

We’ve offered a couple of posts recently (here and here) on mobile technology and its fundraising and relationship building potential. Here, as reported by Nonprofit Technology Network (NTEN), is some more background for you to consider … a study prepared by LoyaltyClicks, a tech firm that develops web and mobile software for nonprofit organizations, on […]

Learn More November 15, 2010

Fish Where The Fish Are

Guess what happens 110 billion times a month in the US? No, not that – not even close. One-hundred and ten billion text messages are sent per month. “Wow, great”, you say, “ if only I were a teenager or a company marketing to teenagers that would be a relevant statistic.” Not so fast.  Consider […]

Learn More November 11, 2010

Mobile Fundraising … Ready Yet?

With virtually everyone using mobile devices these days, what is the potential for fundraising through this channel? First the latest stats from comScore (September 2010, all US): 234 million mobile device users over age 13 59 million using smart phones 67% of users text 35% of users access their web browser 23% of users access […]

Learn More November 5, 2010

You Have 10 Seconds

Agitator readers know I’m a big fan of online video as a fundraising tool (just Search the site for “online video”). The good news is that the sheer volume of online video viewing is staggering and growing. According to comScore, as of September, 175 million US internet users (84% of the total US online universe) […]

Learn More October 15, 2010

Yesterday’s News

Where did you get your news yesterday, and how much time did you spend getting it? According to the latest survey from the Pew Research Center (the best source for such stuff, IMHO), if you’re an average American you spent 70 minutes gathering your news, allocated as follows: Newspapers (specifically, the printed variety) continue to […]

Learn More September 16, 2010

I “Like” You

Here from eMarketer is a fascinating discussion of what actually motivates individuals to “like” a brand in social nets like Facebook. #1 for consumer brands, not surprisingly, is an interest in getting information about “deals.” But the #2 driver is simply self-expression … people simply want to express their support of a company or brand […]

Learn More September 14, 2010

Reality Is Broken

[Sorry for earlier empty message … The Agitator’s reality was indeed broken!] Reality is broken. Turn it into a game. Now here’s a REALLY BIG, world-changing idea:  Create a secret Headquarters to foster the work of folks who are designing games that make us happier, smarter, stronger, healthier, more collaborative, more creative, better connected to […]

Learn More September 13, 2010

Seniors And Online Social Nets

Here’s the latest from Pew Internet Research on Seniors use of online social nets. As of May 2010, 47% of American internet users age 50-64 use social nets like Facebook, LinkedIn or MySpace, and 26% of those age 65+ do so. These age groups are much slower to try Twitter or other services to update […]

Learn More August 30, 2010

<< 1 … 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 … 27 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!