• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Fundraising analytics / data

Facts and Myths of Donor Surveys

[ Editor’s Note:  During what is a holiday recess for many we’ll re-run some of the most popular posts from 2020.  Leading off this parade is the first of Kevin’s 3-Part series on Donor Surveys.  You can find Part 2 here and Part 3 here. We’ll resume posting new content on Monday, January 11.  Roger] […]

Learn More December 30, 2020

Is Using the Statistical Average Bad for Nonprofits?

Can a statistic be bad? Maybe “bad” is  a bit of an an overstatement but the “Average”, a universally used statistic can sure hide a lot.  And without assigning malice or intent to the “hiding”, reliance on the average as an input to decision making can result in lots of bad outcomes. There are countless examples, […]

Learn More December 14, 2020

Deliberate Giving?

One.  That’s likely the modal number of gift frequency for (cash, one-off) donors on your file. The average gifts per donor per year is ballpark 1.7.  Really strong charities are slightly north of 2 and lousy ones are hovering a few tenths below the average. If you get cash donors to give twice per year […]

Learn More October 5, 2020

Constantly Mailing Your ‘Best’ Donors Can Make Them Your ‘Worst’

It is inarguable that increasing the number of mailings increases current demand/responses.  Send out more mail, get more demand/responses. But, this decision making behind “mail more, make more” lives in the short-term.  We estimate the probability (usually crudely with RFM business rules) that a donor will give and then include them or not.  Because the selection […]

Learn More June 8, 2020

Flattening the Curve?

I write this post with caution,  certainly not to claim definitiveness nor interest in debating epidemiological models. Rather, given the saturated splashing of raw counts and pandemic models absent any detail or context on television, online  and in the newspapers serves as a poignant reminder of the why an understanding of the purpose and use […]

Learn More April 6, 2020

Does Hand Size Predict Fundraising Success?

A belief, once firmly held, is hard to change, even when the evidence and data overwhelmingly refute that belief. Take male hand size.   We all know it correlates with…lower fumble rate among NFL Quarterbacks (why, what were you thinking?) Every year at this time the NFL evaluates college players and their pro worthiness with something […]

Learn More March 2, 2020

Getting More From Digital: Donor Conversion

In an earlier post announcing release of the Blackbaud Institute’s of the 2019 Charitable Giving Report I noted that the growth in online giving was up +6.8% compared to just 1% growth for offline in 2019. Fearing this statistic might spur some readers (or more likely their board members or CEOs) to rush off and […]

Learn More February 28, 2020

“Zero Party” Data is the Best Party Data

To recap our previous post, zero-party data draws a distinction between first party data (i.e. data you have based on direct interaction with your supporters) that is voluntarily, willingly shared and that which is passively and (often) unknowingly collected.  The latter requires inference and assumption, the former is knowing and understanding. There are three types […]

Learn More February 12, 2020

Facts and Myths of Donor Surveys- Part 1 of 3 on Donor Surveys

“The only research you can trust is actual response to real  fundraising.  Surveys can reveal interesting and useful information. But they are no good at uncovering donors’ real motivations. The only way to know that is watching what they do.”   That quote comes from a well-known blogger in the fundraising space.  What it lacks in accuracy […]

Learn More February 3, 2020

More Donors Vs. Better Donors: Cost of Fundraising

In our Science of Ask Strings white paper, we talk about the importance of knowing whether you want more donors or higher-value donors.  After all, the decision about how much to ask for should be predicated on how much risk you are willing to undertake to get a higher average gift. But this is a […]

Learn More January 13, 2020

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!