• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

It’s Not Your Grandma’s Homepage

The newspaper industry is struggling for its life. Of course, that’s not news, but what they’re doing by way searching for life rafts is indeed important and worthy of attention. Not only is their financial survival important, but also a significant part of our civil society fabric is at stake in their future. If they […]

Learn More July 31, 2015

Telefundraising Revisted

 Five years ago today Tom posted on Telefundraising Works, calling it the “neglected stepchild of fundraising.” That post generated significant and helpful comments on approach and technique. Today, 60 months later, we’d appreciate an update from our readers on what’s what and what’s working with this “neglected stepchild”. Here’re some readers’ comments from 5 years ago: First, from Adrian […]

Learn More July 21, 2015

Agitator Now ‘Mobile Responsive’

Some Sundays we sit around our iPads at The Agitator’s Global HQ playing Candy Crush, working the New York Times crossword and, occasionally, arguing over topics for the week ahead. For the last couple of weekends we put away the toys and devoted our spare time to ending The Agitator’s technological hypocrisy. We write a […]

Learn More June 26, 2015

Mobile And Fundraising

These days The Agitator is badgering readers on the importance of mastering mobile almost as much as we hammer away at donor retention. Why? For the simple fact that mobile is becoming the dominant vehicle for digital interaction — from simple communication to entertainment to e-commerce … pulling mobile fundraising along in the wake. Here’s […]

Learn More June 10, 2015

Smartphones: Part 2, Marketing Advice

OK, so you’ve heard plenty of stats by now regarding mobile phone usage. And if you haven’t, just check out yesterday’s Agitator post — Smartphones: Part 1, The Data — featuring comprehensive data from Pew Research. But just to underscore once more the importance of mobile, here are some stats via the Center for Media […]

Learn More May 20, 2015

Smartphones: Part 1, The Data

Today is the first of two overview articles on smartphones, marketing and fundraising. This first article deals with smartphone ownership and usage in the US. [I would expect similar patterns in the other countries where Agitator readers tend to congregate.] Tomorrow I’ll turn to marketing implications, featuring two or three ‘guide’ resources I think fundraisers will […]

Learn More May 19, 2015

Is Your Nonprofit Still Google-Friendly?

Way back when (2013), The Agitator reported — Are You Ready To Pass Inspection? — on a Google study on donor online giving. As we noted: “One of the key findings was the extent to which donors now appear to comparison shop before giving. The Google study says 75% of donors begin the research they conduct on […]

Learn More May 14, 2015

Which Test Won?

I get a feed that presents nothing but various direct marketing tests, almost always from the commercial space. It’s called Which Test Won? You don’t need to add it to your in-box; I’ll watch it for you. Finally, the other day they put up a test involving a nonprofit, in this case Oxfam UK. It […]

Learn More February 20, 2015

The Three Lines That Matter

I can’t explain why, but my ‘To do’ list for 2015 has tilted toward tactical matters — master and use online video, optimize your website for lead generation and conversions, seriously commit to building up your monthly giving program, and become the ‘unforgettable’ nonprofit to your donors (actually, this requires a certain attitude, not just […]

Learn More February 3, 2015

Improve Your Email Campaigns

I suppose at this point in December you’ve already pulled out all the stops with respect to your online fundraising. One group I support (maybe having second thoughts!) has already sent me four email appeals as of December 10th. I’m sure more are to follow until I relent and give! So here’s a ‘next year’ […]

Learn More December 10, 2014

<< 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 … 17 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!