• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

Monthly Giving: How’s Your Organization Doing?

There’s a chapter in my book Retention Fundraising devoted to “Five Easy Retention Wins.” Among the top 5 actions that will improve retention is Monthly Giving. By whatever name –monthly giving, recurring giving, sustainer giving—almost every organization, regardless of size, should already have, or at least should have plans to immediately launch a monthly giving […]

Learn More February 21, 2020

Digital Fundraising: 2019 Year End Results and Insights

It’ll be a few more weeks until the definitive, multi-channel results on 2019 End of Year Giving (EYOG) for the sector are published by the Blackbaud Institute and The Fundraising Effectiveness Project.  However, digital fundraisers take note. Late last week in a post (“Everything you wanted to know about 2019 EOY fundraising but were afraid […]

Learn More January 27, 2020

POSTAL INCREASE ALERT: Urgent Action Needed

If you work with or for an organization that relies on mail impress your boss or clients by giving them a heads up on a real threat to their organization’s future. Better yet: take a few minutes and draft a letter they can send immediately to the Postal Rate Commission. If you’re involved with a […]

Learn More January 20, 2020

More Donors Vs. Better Donors: Intangibles

For our viewers joining the program already in progress, for the past two posts (here and here), Betty (arguing in favor of better donors over more donors) and Mo (arguing in favor of more donors over better donors) have been debating. Today, the final round of the debate: intangibles. Mo: The implications of focusing on […]

Learn More January 17, 2020

More Donors Vs. Better Donors: Long-term and External Benefits

To review, in our  Monday post Betty (arguing in favor of better donors over more donors) won a slight victory over Mo (arguing in favor of more donors over better donors) in talking about costs of fundraising. Today, they will debate again: this time on the topic of external benefits of donors. Mo: The case here […]

Learn More January 14, 2020

More Donors Vs. Better Donors: Cost of Fundraising

In our Science of Ask Strings white paper, we talk about the importance of knowing whether you want more donors or higher-value donors.  After all, the decision about how much to ask for should be predicated on how much risk you are willing to undertake to get a higher average gift. But this is a […]

Learn More January 13, 2020

The Year In Review – Part 2

Here are three additional concerns/opportunities that we raised in 2019 –topics that also happened to be among the most popular with Agitator readers. If acted upon, each one holds substantial promise for a brighter 2020 provided they’re acted upon. Donor Identity.  It won’t surprise frequent Agitator readers that in a study by Donor Graphics for One & […]

Learn More January 6, 2020

We Pause The Year In Review for This Serious Rant

I was moving along to finish Part 2 of my Year in Review post when a Tweet storm caught my eye.  Usually, I ignore ‘em while writing, but this series struck a nerve.  In fact, it reveals how we so ignore and frustrate basic donor needs that I wonder how we even survive. Consequently, I’m […]

Learn More January 3, 2020

The Year in Review: Part 1

Happy New Year! This is the perfect time to invoke the spirit of Janus, the Roman god who looked both forward and backward. Looking at the state of fundraising back in 2019 and forward into 2020 I think three things ae true at the same time.  Fundraising is much worse.  Fundraising is terrible. Fundraising will […]

Learn More January 1, 2020

Fundraisers Abandon Ship

This post first appeared on August 19, 2019 Not only is the nonprofit sector doing a lousy job holding on to donors, we’re apparently equally awful when it comes to retaining nonprofit fundraisers. In a recent survey conducted by The Harris Poll for The Chronicle of Philanthropyand AFP, using a self-selected sample of American and […]

Learn More December 30, 2019

<< 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 … 134 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!