• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Breaking Out of the Status Quo

Are You Donor-Obsessed or Merely Donor-Centric?

Customer experience guru Gerry McGovern warns that even if a company is indeed “customer-centric” that may not be enough these days. “To truly be successful, you need to nurture a customer obsession culture within your organization.”, he warns. The Agitator  says, “Amen.” So, let’s kick ‘donor-centricity’ up a notch and focus on what makes for […]

Learn More March 5, 2018

The Complexity of Simplicity

The universe tends toward entropy, toward ever-increasing complexity.  But you and I don’t need to be unindicted co-conspirators.  We can fight for simple. Fighting for simple isn’t simple.  Complexity is a tricky bastard.  He will plead “it’s just one more” for every field in a form, every message in a communication, every step in a […]

Learn More March 1, 2018

Avoid the Cringe-Inducing Moment of Calling a Deceased Donor

Today we’re adding TrueDeceased  to The Agitator Toolbox. This easy-to-use tool enables you to go online and quickly—and without charge – get an overview of who on your database is deceased. When The Agitator first announced our Data Liberation Crusade and asked what low-cost data services were needed, reader Ann Kensek told us, “My Data Dream would include a database […]

Learn More February 27, 2018

Introducing TrueAppend for Fundraisers

Today we’re adding TrueAppend  to The Agitator Toolbox. This easy-to-use tool enables you to go online and quickly—and without charge – get a demographic overview of your donor database. In a matter of minutes, you’ll receive charts and graphs identifying key characteristics of your donors.  Attributes like Age, Net worth, and Income.  Lifestyle markers like marital […]

Learn More February 20, 2018

Feedback Week: Best of the Rest

So far, we’ve covered the #1, #2, #3, #5, #9, #11 and #12 comments donors have in general feedback.  What do the rest of the comments have in common? Well, they’ll all be covered in this post; other than that, it’s potpourri.  At the very end we’ll cover  the most important comments every organization receives. […]

Learn More February 16, 2018

Feedback Week: What People Don’t Like about Your Online Giving Process

Yesterday, we covered the two most frequent donor feedback comments.  Today, we’re going to talk about #3, #5, #9, and #12. Why jump around?  Because they all have to do with online giving: I want more online giving options! Make it easier to donate online! Why doesn’t it save my info online? That’s not what […]

Learn More February 15, 2018

Feedback Week: Channel and Volume Preferences

For those who missed yesterday’s post, we are going through the top donor comments to top nonprofits.  And you don’t get much more “top” than channel and volume comments. Almost 20% of the total substantive comments were either “don’t mail/email/phone me” or “I would like to receive less mail/fewer phone calls/fewer emails.”  For perspective, the […]

Learn More February 14, 2018

Feedback Week: Unexpressed Desires

No, that’s not the title of the latest Nicholas Sparks novel.  It’s your donors’ existence if you aren’t actively soliciting feedback. For every complaint an organization hears, there are another 26 people with a similar complaint who stay silent.   This probably rings true in your own life – if you have a bad experience, and […]

Learn More February 13, 2018

What Do You Mean When You Say “Segmentation”?

A couple of weeks ago, I stirred things up when arguing that neither demographics nor RFM analysis should be the first point of segmentation for organizations.  In the ensuing discussion, it became clear we are talking about different types and levels of segmentation worth exploring. In (approximate) order from least to most sophisticated: Full file […]

Learn More February 6, 2018

Get Your Millennial Audience Off My Lawn

I’ve been reading The Agitator for years (part of why it’s been such a pleasure to write for this august blog).  But I have a confession to make.  Every time I saw posts like More On Millennials: 6 Ways To Entice Them and Time To Take Notice Of Millennials?, I wasn’t buying. To clarify, I […]

Learn More January 26, 2018

<< 1 … 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 … 133 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!