• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Nonprofit management

Spiking The Punch Bowl, Part 4: More He Said, She Said

The comments keep rolling in. Is there a socially redeeming value to this? Tune in tomorrow. He said: “Our fundraising consultant is wise, highly responsive, a problem solver and knows her stuff really well (and reads your blog!)” Yea … we knew there was one out there! “They get to talk about the work, without […]

Learn More March 1, 2012

Spiking The Punch Bowl, Part 3: He Said, She Said

We’ve already received heaps of response to our Punch Bowl Survey on clients’ and consultants’ perceptions of each other. Timed to coincide with the DMA’s 2012 Nonprofit Washington Conference, where all will make nice to one another. We won’t report the stats until Friday. But as is often the case with surveys, the ‘open-ended’ comments […]

Learn More February 29, 2012

Spiking The Punch Bowl, Part 2: What Consultants Think Of Clients

Yesterday, on behalf of all the client-side readers who have groused to The Agitator, Roger had a go at fundraising consultants. Today I’ll attempt to balance the scales by extracting the kernels of ‘abuse’ we typically hear from consultants about clients. Off the record, of course … one generally doesn’t bite the hand that feeds […]

Learn More February 28, 2012

Spiking The Punch Bowl, Part 1: What Clients Think About Consultants

At the end of this week the DMA’s 2012 Nonprofit Washington Conference will get underway. As consultants and suppliers prepare to entertain and enthrall clients, and as clients sharpen their behind-the-back complaints about consultants, what better time to agitate for a little insight into this strangely symbiotic world of Client & Consultant. In today’s post […]

Learn More February 27, 2012

Online Fundraising: Red-headed Stepchild?

Agitator readers tend to reveal their true passion more often through direct emails to me and Roger than via public comments. Here’s an example, name removed, on a topic that might stir your juices. “Hello Agitator Editor, I am an online fundraising professional who has been in the “business” for almost 10 years now. I […]

Learn More February 21, 2012

2011 Online Giving Grows 13%, Except …

Blackbaud released its 2011 Online Giving Report yesterday, revealing some significant findings and adding new features that most readers should find quite helpful. The 2011 Report is packed with useful data that should help any organization – large, medium or small – uncover opportunities and improve performance. On pages 9-10 there’s a helpful worksheet that […]

Learn More February 17, 2012

Spoiling It For Everyone

Reinier Spruit at the 101Fundraising blog wrote this post — Climate change needed for donor centric fundraising — in The Netherlands back on February 6. He was reporting on a roundtable discussion amongst his country’s five best fundraising organizations, and quoted one of the participants: “As a barrier to further income growth I’d like to […]

Learn More February 15, 2012

Lessons From Komen Versus PPFA

A final comment on this affair … Learn from it! Follow some of these accounts of how Komen is responding (or should): From Holly Hall at the Chronicle of Philanthropy From the Washington Post From social media commentator Erik Sass From blogger Kivi Leroux Miller, a play-by-play I’m sure there will be more. This affair […]

Learn More February 7, 2012

Komen Versus Planned Parenthood

Officially The Agitator is a blog about nonprofit fundraising and communications. So I’m recommending you read Getting Attention’s Nancy Schwartz’s excellent analysis of the Komen vs. Planned Parenthood debacle from the perspective of what makes for effective (and ineffective communications) and smart fundraising (on Planned Parenthood’s part) in response to threat. Tom P.S. Stuff ’em […]

Learn More February 3, 2012

Mobile Shopping for Charities

Pew Research has just released this study on how Americans use their mobile phones to assist with in-store purchasing decisions. There’s an underlying phenomenon here that’s highly relevant, I think, to nonprofit fundraising. Pew reports that more than half of adult cell phone owners used their cell phones while they were in a store to […]

Learn More February 2, 2012

<< 1 … 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 … 134 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!