• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Major donors

Here’s A Successful Fundraising Event

Awhile back we reported on Seth Godin’s rant against fundraising events. And I confess The Agitator leaned toward Godin’s point of view, though we waffled a bit. That post generated quite a few comments — pro and con. So we feel duty bound to bring you attention to this successful fundraising event — for the […]

Learn More November 3, 2011

Fundraising Atlas Does More Than Shrug

At the end of April I reported on a new forecasting service, The Atlas of Giving. I called it an important innovation because fundraisers have largely sought guidance through the rear view mirror of past performance, as opposed to steering through the windshield of the present and future. After all, ‘til the Atlas of Giving […]

Learn More November 2, 2011

Isn’t It Nice To Win?

The winner for Most Innovative Fundraising Campaign at the recent International Fundraising Congress was Diankonie Frankfurt, for a campaign called Help the Oma (grandmothers). The campaign actually sought to enlist volunteers to help with Diakonie’s various social service programs. [I hope I’m reasonably accurate … my German isn’t what it used to be!] Here’s the […]

Learn More October 31, 2011

First, Make Rice

Roger and I are planning to push hard for innovation in posts to come. But don’t mistake that thrust for our abandoning of the necessity to master the basic fundamentals of fundraising. Seth Godin wrote a real gem on this point a couple of weeks ago. It’s short, so I’ve reproduced in its entirety … […]

Learn More October 26, 2011

Putting The Lipstick On

A couple of posts back, we said, “The product matters“. In response, along comes Kathy Swayze with a comment saying what few fundraisers dare to say: “Your ‘quality of the product matters’ resonates. But how many fundraisers are stuck trying to put lipstick on a pig because the mission, focus and actions of their organization […]

Learn More October 25, 2011

The Product Matters

I’m both an opera fan and a commentator on fundraising, so I eagerly read the NY Times article a week or so back on the spectacular recent fundraising success of NewYork’s Metropolitan Opera. The headline flagged that the Met had raised $182 million in donations. This amount was fully 50% more than it had raised […]

Learn More October 21, 2011

UK Donor Commitment Study

Our colleagues at DonorVoice are going to replicate in the UK their recent US study of donor commitment. The call is out for UK charities who would like to participate in the study, which will be conducted in association with Ken Burnett and SOFII. Here is what Ken said about the US study, as well […]

Learn More October 19, 2011

Godin Trashes Fundraising Galas

In a recent post titled Gala economics, marketing maven Seth Godin trashes fundraising galas. He argues: “…the gala is actually corrupting. Attendees are usually driven by social and selfish motivations to attend, and thus the philanthropic element of giving–just to give–is removed.” Of course, one could argue that many ‘big checks’ are so-motivated, at least […]

Learn More October 18, 2011

Who Are The First Movers?

As reported in Direct Marketing News, idea merchant Malcolm Gladwell (Tipping Point, Blink, etc) delivered a speech recently in which he said, when it comes to innovation … don’t be first! I can just hear Roger now: “He must have delivered that same speech to some big nonprofit fundraising conference … and everyone has taken […]

Learn More October 14, 2011

When Do Fundraisers Need Help?

As in … outside consultants. I liked these words of advice from Pamela Barden, via Fundraising Success. Consider an outside consultant — a “personal trainer” as she puts it — when: 1. Mentally, you’ve set limits. As in … “There’s no way we can do that; we don’t have the resources.” “We tried that several […]

Learn More October 13, 2011

<< 1 … 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 … 134 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!