• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

Lazy Or Careless Fundraising?

Here’s an email The Agitator received yesterday … Good morning Agitator! I had two very disappointing donor experiences occur yesterday, and I just wanted to share. Mainly because BOTH could have been avoided if somebody had bothered to take a look at their own data correctly. The first experience was recounted to me by a […]

Learn More February 4, 2011

Giving Attitudes Surveyed By Harris Interactive

Don’t know how I missed this, but back in November Harris Interactive released this very interesting survey on the charitable giving habits and plans of Americans. Their report includes some interesting trend data comparing 2007 and 2010 responses. Most respondents (48%) categorize themselves as follows: “I make some kind of small contribution of time and/or […]

Learn More February 3, 2011

Speaking Up For Mail

We recently noted the latest Pew Internet Research findings on US online habits across various generations. Here’s the main point: “In what they term the ‘biggest online trend’ Pew reports that certain key internet activities — including donating — are becoming more uniformly popular across all age groups.” Bonnie Catena of Amnesty USA offered this […]

Learn More February 1, 2011

New Donor Surveys

Here are two recent donor surveys that have come to our attention. Given the usual focus on studying Boomers, we were surprised read on Social Citizens blog about this 2010 study of Millennial Donors conducted by fundraising agencies Achieve and JGL. A fresh study will be released in April. The basic message of the Millennials […]

Learn More January 26, 2011

How Does It Make You Feel?

Have you ever asked this rather crucial question of your nonprofit’s donors: “How does supporting [your organization] make you feel?” ActionAid in the UK is doing just that … in this creative way. Check out their ‘Happy Bubble’ campaign. Do your donors feel something about your organization? Or do you just take that for granted? […]

Learn More January 25, 2011

RFM Too Crude For Fundraising

In a recent Agitator post I referred to the practice of using simple RFM in the fundraising segmentation process as ‘crude’. The equivalent of using an axe where a scalpel would be much more productive. Many Agitator readers emailed me to ask “Why?”  Here’s why. I chose ‘crude’ to describe the way three important variables […]

Learn More January 24, 2011

Generations Online 2010

More good stuff from Pew Internet Research you might have missed over the holidays. Here’s their latest report, Generations Online 2010, comparing the online behavior and internet use of Americans across generations. In what they term the “biggest online trend” Pew reports that certain key internet activities — including donating — are becoming more uniformly […]

Learn More January 21, 2011

The Dragonfly Effect

Writing in the Stanford Social Innovation Review, marketing and psychology veterans Jennifer Aaker and Andy Smith offer the ‘Dragonfly Effect’ as a construct for nonprofits to think about and formulate social media campaigns … “To us, the Dragonfly Effect shows how synchronized ideas can be used to create rapid transformations through social media. The method […]

Learn More January 19, 2011

Do Your Donors Trust You?

SOFII, a terrific resource for fundraisers, recently published an analysis of the following letter sent to Oxfam Ireland by one of its donors. The analysis was written by Damian O’Broin, director of Ask Direct, a fundraising and direct marketing agency in Dublin. Please find enclosed a cheque… to pay for raffle tickets… Oxfam is my […]

Learn More January 13, 2011

Are You Too Timid?

When is the last time you — or your nonprofit — seized and implemented a really big fundraising innovation? If an example jumps immediately to mind, I hope you’ll share it through us with other Agitator readers. If you’re struggling to come up with an example, read these two recent articles by fundraising consultant and […]

Learn More January 11, 2011

<< 1 … 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 … 134 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!