• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Why has this taken so long?!

Every fundraising consultant worth their salt talks these days about integrating the various available channels … most often with specific reference to the direct mail and online channels. Meantime, the big online fundraising firms continually bombard us with data on the growth of online donations. For example, earlier this month Convio reported it had passed […]

Learn More October 14, 2010

Creativity Killers

I’ve read heaps of academic literature and pop psychology on “creativity” and where it comes from, whether it can be nurtured, what other traits are associated with it, etc. But here is one of the most concise and useful treatments I’ve seen regarding the blockages that can impede the creativity, at whatever level, of any […]

Learn More October 12, 2010

Best Fundraising Website – III

So I grumped about readers not offering their comments on my choice for best fundraising website, after I nominated Charity:Water. And readers responded … some seconding Charity:Water, some offering improvements to that site, and some recommending other sites. Terrific! Each of you responders deserves an Agitator raise! Now, I know that you’re not going to […]

Learn More October 7, 2010

Revolution Won’t Be Tweeted

In a New Yorker article titled Small Change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted, the always provocative Malcolm Gladwell (Tipping Point, Blink, etc) takes on social media. In a nutshell, Gladwell argues that social media merely enable a sort of faux activism … not the “real thing” of social transformation, a la the sit-ins […]

Learn More October 6, 2010

Best Fundraising Website – II

Frankly, I’m astonished. On Friday, not the optimal email message day according to all the stats on such matters, The Agitator (or at least Tom) recommended our pick of the best fundraising website out there. Nearly 3,500 individuals have read that email, with almost 1,000 clicking through to check out the recommended site. [And no, […]

Learn More October 5, 2010

Nature Or Nurture?

Kristin McCurry of MINDset Direct is one of our favorite co-conspirators. As today’s Guest Agitator, she poses a question all fundraisers have asked in their darkest moments … Does it really matter what we do as fundraisers?! Or is “good donor behavior” simply built into some individuals who we are lucky enough to initially attract […]

Learn More October 4, 2010

Best Fundraising Website

I was asked the other day which I thought was the most compelling fundraising website. My answer — and I respect we all have our idiosyncrasies — is Charity:Water. Why? 1. Very appealing graphically, clean as a whistle, one of the simplest nonprofit homepages (and design throughout) I’ve ever seen. 2. Very compelling use of […]

Learn More October 1, 2010

Fundraising Flat Says Target Analytics

Target Analytics has just released its Index of National Fundraising Performance for the 12 months of activity through the 2nd Quarter of 2010. With essentially flat revenue and donor growth from the first half of 2009 through the first half of 2010, there are still some rays of sunshine in an otherwise pretty dreary fundraising […]

Learn More September 29, 2010

Fundraisers, More Sharing Please!

A few days ago, we posted on Crowd Accelerated Innovation … a phenomenon powered by the unique attributes of universally-distributed online video. And we urged fundraisers to use this approach to raise the bar and spread innovation. Which, in turn, would require sharing their best work and success stories. That post elicited this terrific offer […]

Learn More September 24, 2010

Vote For Best Nonprofit Tagline

Take a few minutes to cast your vote for best nonprofit tagline in Nancy Schwartz’s third annual competition. We have. Nancy, who publishes one of our favorite e-newsletters, Getting Attention, has served up 70 taglines in thirteen categories for your assessment. These were culled from about 2,700 entries. Nancy points out: “A strong tagline is […]

Learn More September 23, 2010

<< 1 … 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 … 134 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!