• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Nonprofit management

Direct Mail vs. Online Acquisition – II

“Can't we all just get along?” asks Kim Cubine of direct response fundraising agency Adams Hussey. She's commenting on yesterday's Agitator post, which referenced the “Great Debate” at recent Bridge Conference between direct mail and online donor fundraising. Nothing like hard data to back up a point! Here's her full comment: “Instead of debating which […]

Learn More July 20, 2007

Direct Mail vs. Online Acquisition

The recent Bridge Conference in Washington focused attention on the need for nonprofit fundraisers to integrate their direct mail and online channels. Here's a good summary of key points from Karen Taggart at Care2, as published by FundRaising Success Advisor. As we see it, for virtually all nonprofits, direct mail is still the acquisition king. […]

Learn More July 19, 2007

More Reasons To Monitor Prez Campaigns

We periodically remind our nonprofit org readers to monitor and learn from the communications practices of the presidential campaigns. So here's plenty to stretch your mind on a Monday morning. Not everything these guys do is brilliant, but the campaigns are a hotbed of experimentation with new media approaches. For example, here's a good Washington […]

Learn More July 16, 2007

Managing The Alumni Experience Online

We saw this press release from online marketing agency Kintera, and thought it worth passing along. The University of Notre Dame uses Kintera technology to manage its alumni experience, including sophisticated social networking and engagement capabilities, as well as fundraising. With about 120,000 graduates active in more than 300 alumni clubs, we imagine the challenge […]

Learn More July 13, 2007

Closing The Online Donation

Awhile back, the Chronicle of Philanthropy reported (subscription required) the experience of the American Heart Association, who by systematic tweaking of their online donation process, terrifically increased their online conversion rates. Importantly, the changes were made on the basis of careful online user research, not seat-of-the-pants intuition. The impressive results … the percentage of prospects […]

Learn More July 11, 2007

Long Live Direct Mail

Here's some interesting (yawn!) data (yawn!) on consumers' preferences (yawn!) for direct mail (yawn!, yawn!) over email (yaw …) WAIT! Did they really say consumers prefer to get direct mail over email?! According to (not entirely disinterested) Pitney Bowes, the answer is YES! Here are the stats from a recent PB-sponsored consumer survey: 73% prefer […]

Learn More June 29, 2007

New Media Campaigning … Issues Or Boobs?

The contribution of new media to the quality of political discourse is vastly over-rated. I just got an urgent email from David Plouffe, Barack Obama's campaign manager. [There's the first problem … like I care about the campaign manager! You might as well send me a message from the campaign mascot.] What's it about? Obama's […]

Learn More June 22, 2007

Nothing Like Passion In Politics

Last week we reported on the impact of video watched online … it gets people to do things! The data on online video use we cited was a year-old, ancient in the web timescale, so here's some new data from ComScore, from March 2007: 71% of US internet users, or 126 million folks, streamed 7 […]

Learn More June 18, 2007

Impressive Stats For Online Video

Slaggards that we are, we've only now discovered some impressive stats on consumer use of and response to online video, including online advertising, released by the Online Publishers Association. Although the figures relate to commercial use of online video, nonprofit marketers interested in testing the medium for fundraising, lead generation or activist recruitment (which should […]

Learn More June 14, 2007

Amnesty International’s Eyes On Darfur

Here is a brilliant use of internet technology (to say nothing of satellite technology) to advance a cause … hopefully saving lives. Amnesty International has created a website, Eyes on Darfur, which uses satellite photography to monitor and compile evidence of the violence in Darfur. Along with continually updated satellite imagery of villages throughout the […]

Learn More June 13, 2007

<< 1 … 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 … 108 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!