• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Online fundraising and marketing

Do You Know What They Know About You?

This post by Seana Mulcahy alerts us to a complaint filed with the Federal Trade Commission by the Center for Digital Democracy and the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. They complain that website owners are using powerful tools for user tracking and behavioral targeting to capture and exploit too much data on their visitors, without […]

Learn More November 13, 2006

Building Better Email Lists

Here are some very practical pointers on building email subscriber lists that are responsive and durable. From Return Path, a leading email marketing vendor. While the illustrations draw from the commercial marketing world, with a little imagination you can connect the dots to apply this advice in the nonprofit setting. Each of the following points […]

Learn More October 20, 2006

Internet & Politics — 2006 Vintage

Burst Media reports that four in ten netizens have visited a candidate's website this election season, and one-third visited the site of an advocacy group. Interestingly, about 65% visited the sites of groups they knew they didn't support, or thought they might not support. Open-minded? Looking for dirt? And what do they see when they […]

Learn More October 17, 2006

Email + Video = Fundraising Impact

As far as we can recall, this e-solicitation from the American Lung Association is the first time we've received an e-appeal using an embedded video to help attract attention and drive home the message. The message here: asthma can kill … join our Asthma Walk to help raise the funds we need to find a […]

Learn More October 14, 2006

TV Or Internet Video?

How you like your “moving pictures” served up is mostly a matter of generation. For example, according to Forrester Research, GenXers (age 13-26) spend 12.2 hours a week on the internet and 10.6 hours watching TV. At the other end of the spectrum, Seniors (age 62+) spend 3.8 hours a week on the internet and […]

Learn More September 30, 2006

Numbers To Note

Here are some important numbers that have crossed our laptops in the past few days. First, politics and cyberspace. Through our research umbilical cord, the folks at Pew Internet Project, comes the news that on a typical day in August 2006, 26 million Americans turned to the internet for news or information about politics and […]

Learn More September 23, 2006

Human Rights Campaign Has The Virus … Award

This time, the Human Rights Campaign and Donordigital deserve the raise. The Human Rights Campaign just received “Most innovative viral list growth campaign” at GetActive's Third Annual User Conference, GetTogether 2006, for its “Boot the Bigot” online game and petition. This promotion was designed to raise awareness around the mid-term elections and turn out pro-equality […]

Learn More September 21, 2006

Remembering 9/11

The outpouring of the generosity that followed in the hours, days and weeks after the assaults on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon five years ago today clearly demonstrated that the World Wide Web had suddenly come of age. Virtually overnight the importance of this new medium became apparent. Yet none of the major […]

Learn More September 11, 2006

Network for Good Studies Online Disaster Giving

Network for Good has released a study based upon the $24.5 million in online contributions that it channeled in response to three major disasters: the December 2004 tsunamis, hurricane Katrina in August 2005, and the Pakistan earthquake of October 2005. Key takeaways: Disaster giving follows a “fast but fleeting” pattern, spiking in a short 2-6 […]

Learn More September 5, 2006

You Tanned, You Missed

If you spent the end of August sunning, you might have missed a flurry of media discussion about how online tools are impacting political and issue campaigning. As we hunker down for the 60 day or so sprint to Election Day 2006, here's some of the prognosticating about online campaigning. Guess what, TV still rules […]

Learn More September 4, 2006

<< 1 … 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!