• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

We Prove Every Dollar

My e-mailbox today included these two messages. From the Chronicle of Philanthropy, I received this article, Donors Say They Would Give More If They Saw More Results, reporting on robust research conducted by fundraiser Penelope Burk. But I have to ask: has anyone ever conducted donor research that did not conclude: It’s the Results, Stupid! […]

Learn More June 22, 2012

Why Not Raise More Money?

The other day, this headline caught my attention: What’s Holding Your Nonprofit Back From Raising More Money? Not surprisingly, it turned out to be a consulting pitch from a firm called Social Velocity. Nothing wrong with that. What that firm would do to provide a broad assessment of revenue potential is: Interview stakeholders Review documents […]

Learn More June 21, 2012

Sue’s Donate Page Challenge

Sue Woodward at International Fellowship of Christians and Jews sent The Agitator a challenge. She’s re-doing the organization’s website, and has been searching other orgs’ websites — fruitlessly — for what might be a model Donate page. Her challenge to us, which we’re passing along to Agitator readers: “Find a decent, well organized, user friendly […]

Learn More June 19, 2012

What?! An Obama Online Campaigning Mistake?

Most politicos concede that the 2008 Obama presidential campaign re-defined online political fundraising and mobilization. Could it be that the “B Team” is running his online campaigning in 2012? Video-Commerce.org recently ran this article, What You Can Learn from Obama’s Video Email Marketing Mistakes. The piece criticizes an variety of mis-steps, from truthfulness (or not) […]

Learn More June 12, 2012

65+ Finally Over 50+

Finally, according to Pew Internet, more than half of Americans age 65 or older are online … 53% to be exact. Of these online seniors, 70% use the internet on a typical day and 86% use email. Just watch those online contributions blossom as the most proven segment of the donor population gets comfortable with […]

Learn More June 8, 2012

“Networked Individualism”

Lee Rainie and Barry Wellman have written an important new book called Networked: The New Social Operating System. As described on the authors’ website, it draws heavily on data accumulated by the Pew Research Center. Networked explores the convergence of three technologies — broadband, mobile connectivity, and social networking — and consumer adaptation to them. […]

Learn More June 7, 2012

Community First, Monetize Later

That’s the mantra recommended by social media strategist and blogger Ephraim Gopin in his recent Fundraising Success article, Attention! Social Media Does Not Equal Fundraising! Says Gopin: “If you’re going into social media thinking dollars and cents, get out now. If you go in looking to engage, interact and build up a community of people […]

Learn More June 6, 2012

Is Blackbaud Too Nice?

Fundraisers devote a lot of energy – probably too much – to social media, mobile and the next new thing. We neglect to our detriment strategic focus and concern about the important and fundamental ‘plumbing’ of contemporary fundraising – the database, CRM, eCRM platforms and other fundraising software applications. No matter how sparkling, shiny, fun […]

Learn More June 5, 2012

Video Testimonials

From Video-Commerce.org, some encouragement to use — you guessed it — video testimonials. Most fundraisers have long used donor (and even better) beneficiary testimonials in their printed communications. Effective to be sure. But they can’t quite pack the same punch as hearing it straight from the horse’s mouth. ‘Face-to-face’ testimonials deliver more authenticity and more […]

Learn More June 4, 2012

Our Accomplishments Together

Debra Richmond commends this email Annual Report from Be The Match, a bone marrow registry helping patients get transplants from non-related donors. I agree. Using simple infographics, the email (subject line: Our Accomplishments Together ) effectively delivers the bottom line results (how could you not scroll through?), emphasizing that you — the donor — made […]

Learn More May 29, 2012

<< 1 … 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 … 108 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!