• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Women On The Web

comScore, a leading collector and analyst of digital/internet data, has just released Women on the Web: How Women Are Shaping the Internet. From the introduction to their 31-page global study: “Everyone from advertisers to content producers to agencies to non-profits to politicians and policy makers can benefit from understanding Web usage through a gender-specific lens. […]

Learn More July 29, 2010

Grist Envy

Before the internet, many cause organizations represented the only trusted source of in-depth information available nationwide on issues that people cared passionately about. If you really wanted to delve into money and politics, you joined Common Cause. Into human rights, you joined Amnesty. Civil liberties, the ACLU. Into the environment, a variety of choices. These […]

Learn More July 28, 2010

Cut Attrition In Half

Want to know how CARE International cut in half the attrition rate of its face-to-face acquired donors? They’ve created an online reporting approach that speaks in a personalized way to individual donors, telling them in specific terms what their (i.e., “Your“) contributions are accomplishing. Wow! Doesn’t that sound like a no-brainer? Well, the concept might […]

Learn More July 27, 2010

Magnets Anyone?

Here’s an article from DirectMarketingIQ extolling the virtues of involvement devices in direct mail appeals. Magnets are a classic. First of all, yes, lots of testing confirms that this stuff generally lifts response (but that’s not an excuse to not test before you commit your own nonprofit to thousands of tchotchkes). The article asserts that […]

Learn More July 26, 2010

Improve Your Online Fundraising

Here’s a great presentation from Convio on improving the fundraising performance of your website. I like it because its recommendations are data-driven … they didn’t spring out the imagination of someone’s creative department. And I like the recommendations because they are specific and produced real results for the client who is the subject of the […]

Learn More July 23, 2010

Excitement Or Peacefulness?

Here’s a brief article at Engage: Boomers that once again reminds us as marketers/fundraisers to think carefully about our audience and put ourselves in their shoes. Brent Bouchez, principal in a firm that focuses on messaging to the 50+ universe, cites a Stanford Graduate School of Business study on age and happiness, which found — […]

Learn More July 22, 2010

Spectators or Fans – II

I’d like to pull together strands from two recent Agitator posts. Spectators or Fans dealt with the challenge of moving individuals a nonprofit might engage from being relatively passive observers to becoming active advocates. Then we reported on two extremely helpful online fundraising reports from Convio and Blackbaud respectively. In response to our post on […]

Learn More July 19, 2010

More Good News Re Online Fundraising

On Tuesday Tom alerted us to Convio’s Benchmark Report on Online Fundraising for 2009. Today Blackbaud is out with another new Index –The Blackbaud Index of Online Giving. This fundraising index reports revenue trends on a monthly basis for 1,787 nonprofits representing $399 million in 12 month online revenue. The new Index is based on […]

Learn More July 15, 2010

Cell Phones & Fundraising

Pew Internet Research has released survey results indicating that 40% of adult American cell phone owners now use their cell phones to access the internet, email, or instant messaging. 34% (up from 25% in 2009) use their cellphones to access email. With outbound email appeals still the workhorse of online fundraising, I’m wondering what challenges […]

Learn More July 14, 2010

Convio’s Online Fundraising Report

If you haven’t yet seen Convio’s benchmark report on online fundraising for 2009, founder Vinay Bhagat’s video summary should wet your appetite. Heaps of data here, based on results from some 600 Convio online fundraising clients. Some highlights: Individual giving down only 0.4% compared to 3.6% for all philanthropy; Online fundraising returns up 14% for […]

Learn More July 13, 2010

<< 1 … 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 … 108 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!