• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Online fundraising and marketing

A Quality Online Conference

May seems to be the month for online fundraising conferences. We’ve already mentioned the May 20 e-conference of Fundraising Success. Here’s another … with a point of distinction … an online conference with "peer review"!! When have you been to any fundraising conference where the presentations were "peer-reviewed?" That’s the point of differentiation for ifc […]

Learn More April 21, 2010

Thank You, Agitator Readers

The Chronicle of Philanthropy just released its latest annual survey of the largest 176 US nonprofits regarding their online fundraising. Apparently they asked respondents to identify their favorite "blog about the nonprofit world" and — we’re pleased to report — according to this "word cloud" report, The Agitator ranks as most popular!   Granted, it’s […]

Learn More April 20, 2010

Improve Your Fundraising Odds

On Thursday, May 20, FundRaising Success will offer its very first virtual conference and exhibition, Engaging, Enlightening, Empowering Donors. It’s seven hours of sessions offering the latest and most effective fundraising strategies, tips and tactics for your organization. Fundraising Success has assembled an impressive line-up of fundraising professionals to share their insights, including we humbly […]

Learn More April 19, 2010

8 Seconds To Score

I noticed this post in email Insider regarding effective marketing emails. Here’s the kernel: "Studies show that subscribers will spend just eight seconds on most messages before clicking through or navigating away. Your emails will drive the most dollars if you take on the eight-second challenge and use that time (or even better, less time […]

Learn More April 8, 2010

Inspiration Via YouTube

Here’s a piece that demonstrates the efficacy of YouTube. Read the story, then watch the video … after about three minutes of standing ovation, you’ll be treated to an encore performance. It’s not about a charity or nonprofit … or — directly — about fundraising. But it does suggest that if you do inspiring work, […]

Learn More April 7, 2010

Kudos To Salvation Army

Here’s just a plain old "good news" post. The Salvation Army has done a terrific job of remaining relevant and vital in changing times. A great case study in organizational renewal, particularly as nonprofits begin to think more and more about competition from "fresh faces" in the sector. So, as reported in Philanthropy Journal, it’s […]

Learn More April 6, 2010

Excellent Online Fundraising Advice

Over Easter, I had a chance to read The 8 Online Fundraising Changes You Must Make in 2010, an excellent e-book by Katya Andresen at Network for Good. If you are looking for very practical tips in terms of techniques and best practices, you won’t be disappointed. But this guide is much deeper and richer […]

Learn More April 5, 2010

Terrible Fundraising Headline

I love Todd Cohen’s Philanthropy Journal. Excellent range of content. I’m a faithful reader. But I hate this March 26 headline: Fundraising out of sync with giving habits Todd’s story leads as follows: "Technology is changing the way people give, with different generations preferring to give in different ways, and nonprofits should adjust their fundraising […]

Learn More March 31, 2010

New Generational Giving Data

Convio has produced this valuable white paper on generational giving patterns. It’s based on a 2010 survey of 1500 recent donors to nonprofits. The paper is framed around four segments — Matures, Boomers, Gen X and Gen Y. It’s chock full of data on how different generations give, their giving amounts, how they interact with […]

Learn More March 26, 2010

Adopt A Nerd

I was intrigued by this email fundraising appeal from Environmental Defense Fund (one of my alma maters), because it offered me some choice as a donor.   However, I don’t think EDF pushed the choice concept as far as they  could (see MyProjects for  a look at what real donor choice looks like). The choice […]

Learn More March 25, 2010

<< 1 … 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 … 108 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!