• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

Are We Completely Wrong?

Donor-Central asks: Are we completely wrong? Posing the possibility that donors don’t want more of a relationship with their charities … in fact, they want less. And if that’s right, says Donor-Central, then the traditional direct response model — acquire as cheaply as possible and then cultivate like hell — is breaking down. They cite […]

Learn More August 10, 2011

Social Web Elitism

David Sirota, writing in Salon.com, claims that the social net arena is dominated by well-educated elites, skewing and limiting the kind of political and issue debate that occurs. Drawing from a study by Jen Schradie reviewing Pew Internet Research data, he notes that education level is by far the most significant predictor of participation with […]

Learn More August 3, 2011

Testing Fundraising’s Urban Myth?

WANTED! Curious, concerned, innovative volunteers to participate in discovering the vaccine for Defecting Donor Syndrome We’re about to undertake an applied research project aimed at helping nonprofits increase the retention and Life Time Value of their donors and members. We’re looking for four or five pioneering volunteers to participate with us.  At our cost and […]

Learn More June 27, 2011

Belt Tightening Continues

While you’re contemplating yesterday’s Agitator post about who provides the most useful “macro” data about charitable giving trends, contemplate this snapshot of consumer spending intentions. According to the American Pulse Survey, conducted twice monthly across a representative panel of 5,000 Americans, 90% do not expect a pay increase in the coming year. And here’s how […]

Learn More June 23, 2011

Twitter Update From Pew

I’m alerting you to this report reluctantly, because I’m a Twitter avoider. But Pew Research says 13% of online Americans — 19% in the biggest using 25-34 year-old cohort — now use the service, so I guess it’s my duty. Usage goes up with education! UGH! Tom

Learn More June 13, 2011

Magic Fundraising Machine At Work

Roger’s post yesterday is well on its way to being one of The Agitator’s ‘most-read’ ever. How could it not be — Magic Fundraising Machine Boosts ROI. What self-respecting fundraiser could resist a claim like that?! Numerous readers have emailed The Agitator, asking Roger to open his trench coat … “show me the money”! We’re […]

Learn More May 13, 2011

Magic Fundraising Machine Boosts ROI

For years I’ve been quietly steaming about two inventions that I suspect have done great damage to effective direct mail fundraising. Even calling them out will make me seem like a Luddite, a curmudgeon or worse. But truly, I haven’t lost my mind, so bear with me. The first technological culprit is Microsoft’s “Excel”, or […]

Learn More May 12, 2011

Double Your Landing Page Conversion Rate

If your nonprofit is making fundraising or other offers on your website, how valuable would it be to double your landing page conversion rate? Enough to interest you in this offer of a free optimization test from the House of Kaizen? Now, I have no firsthand experience with this UK website optimization agency, but they […]

Learn More May 11, 2011

Ghosts Of Fundraising Past And Future

Fundraisers, unlike practitioners in most other sectors, mostly navigate their way forward by steering through the rear view mirror. Off hand I can’t think of any other group, with their future so dependent on the economy and other key events, who live by the “past is prologue” mantra. In today’s world, that dependence can deliver […]

Learn More April 28, 2011

More Direct Mail Test Results

I love testing! Every marketer/fundraiser should have an addiction to testing built into their genes. Here are some tests reported on SOFII by Willis Turner, senior copywriter at Huntsinger & Jeffer. His examples — all dealing with direct mail acquisition packages — cover … Two-color vs four-color carrier Short vs long letter Mailing labels gift […]

Learn More April 26, 2011

<< 1 … 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 … 55 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!