• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor retention / loyalty / commitment

They Never Even Ask!

Last week I urged you to read Network for Good’s excellent study on online giving. In case you haven’t, here’s a passage that might interest you. Noting that those who give to charities’ own websites give more over time than donors who give via ‘portal’ or social networking sites, the study observes: “Charities don’t always […]

Learn More December 13, 2010

Twittering Away

Pew Internet Research has reported some interesting  new data on Twitter usage, which triggered this set of commenting articles … worthwhile reading. Bottomline: 8% of online Americans say they’ve used Twitter. But 41% say they ‘hardly ever’ use their account. For more sense of proportion, Twitter’s 15 million users compare to Facebook’s 151 million unique […]

Learn More December 10, 2010

Meet Gary

In this white paper, Your Donor in 3D, fundraising agency Good Works introduces Gary … your typical three-dimensional donor. Their point is that fundraisers need to speak to three aspects of the donor’s awareness — rational, emotional and spiritual. The white paper elaborates on these eight ways to conduct the conversation … 1. Tell stories […]

Learn More December 3, 2010

How Much Fundraising R&D?

Yesterday I summarized Ken Burnett’s recent recommendations regarding “7 things for fundraisers to do now.” Two that I think are especially important relate to fundraising R&D and knowing your data. Regarding R&D, Ken recommends earmarking (‘ring-fencing’ as the Brits say) 10% of your fundraising budget for rigorous testing of new ideas. While of course there’s […]

Learn More November 30, 2010

Comfort For Direct Mail Fundraisers

DirectMarketingIQ offers this article reporting on an Epsilon study of consumer preferences (in US and Canada) for various marketing channels. Direct mail comes though with flying colors. The most important reason seems to be that consumers trust information in the mail more than online. Says Epsilon: “Consumers stated loud and clear that information is more […]

Learn More November 19, 2010

4 Global Fundraising Trends

Joe Boland at Fundraising Success writes about four global fundraising trends identified by Blackbaud in their recent report, 2010 State of the Fundraising Industry. Here they are: New fundraising and communication channels, although growing, are not replacing traditional channels. [Yep.] ROI and organizational effectiveness are under scrutiny (by donors) and more important than ever. [They […]

Learn More November 10, 2010

You Have 10 Seconds

Agitator readers know I’m a big fan of online video as a fundraising tool (just Search the site for “online video”). The good news is that the sheer volume of online video viewing is staggering and growing. According to comScore, as of September, 175 million US internet users (84% of the total US online universe) […]

Learn More October 15, 2010

Why has this taken so long?!

Every fundraising consultant worth their salt talks these days about integrating the various available channels … most often with specific reference to the direct mail and online channels. Meantime, the big online fundraising firms continually bombard us with data on the growth of online donations. For example, earlier this month Convio reported it had passed […]

Learn More October 14, 2010

Fundraising Flat Says Target Analytics

Target Analytics has just released its Index of National Fundraising Performance for the 12 months of activity through the 2nd Quarter of 2010. With essentially flat revenue and donor growth from the first half of 2009 through the first half of 2010, there are still some rays of sunshine in an otherwise pretty dreary fundraising […]

Learn More September 29, 2010

“Warm & Fuzzy” Matters

I thought you might be interested in two new studies of corporate brand reputation. Harris Interactive just released its list of top corporate brand reputations for 2009. [They first ask consumers an open-ended question re companies they’ve heard about and think stand out as having “best” reputations. After compiling all those “nominations” they then ask […]

Learn More September 8, 2010

<< 1 … 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 … 55 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!