• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Research

Business Is Bad … And Good

Yesterday we posted on some of the political findings in Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007, just released by the Pew Research Center. Today we'll look at Americans' attitudes about corporations and business. As cause marketers and fundraisers, the bottomline for us in this data is that harnessing the power of corporations to […]

Learn More March 27, 2007

Americans’ Confidence Wanes

We spent the weekend immersed in the Pew Research Center's just released Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007. Fascinating stuff. We hardly know where to begin. If your nonprofit is engaged in mobilizing supporters around any cause or agenda whatsoever, there's relevant data in this report for you. It's “must read.” Bottomline for […]

Learn More March 26, 2007

MarketingSherpa

A recent post by Nancy Schwartz at Getting Attention reminded The Agitator just how valuable MarketingSherpa is. Gail was touting Marketing Wisdom for 2007, their annual compilation of best marketing lessons. All sorts of marketers submit items about something they learned in the previous year, and the editors at MarketingSherpa pick out and publish the […]

Learn More March 21, 2007

Who Do You Trust?

Where do you stand on this question … Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you can't be too careful in dealing with people? Pew Research recently used this and two related questions to compile an index of public trust. Among all adults, Americans are closely divided. 45% believe […]

Learn More February 27, 2007

American Optimism Suits 2007 Fundraising

Pew Research Center recently published survey findings regarding Americans’ attitudes about their financial prospects for the coming year. If optimism equates with donor largesse, nonprofits should be in for a good 2007. Some key findings: About four-in-ten American adults say they are living comfortably, while another three-in-ten say they have enough money to meet expenses […]

Learn More January 22, 2007

Pew, Pew, Pew!

The Agitator just can't say enough good things about the various Pew Research arms. If you collect a paycheck from a nonprofit group and do not regularly follow the various studies of these folks on Americans' media habits, on attitudes of various demographic segments about public issues, about trends in media coverage, you oughta be […]

Learn More January 12, 2007

Stats Trivia For Every Taste

Perhaps overlooked in the holiday rush, the US Census Bureau has just released the Statistical Abstract for the United States: 2007. Their own press release headlined the fact that American adults and teens will spend five months (3518 hours) watching television, surfing the internet, reading newspapers, and listening to personal music devices. That's almost half […]

Learn More January 6, 2007

Giving Totals for 2006

In case you missed it over the holidays, a survey for the Wall Street Journal conducted by Harris Interactive found that 83% of Americans contributed to a charity in 2006, with average total giving of $1220 (down about a hundred bucks from 2005). Here are the categories used, with percentage of respondents giving to each. […]

Learn More January 2, 2007

Homo Broadbandicus

Actually, according to market research firm Media-Screen (as reported by Clickz Network), among the 57 million Americans with broadband access, five distinct sub-species of broadband users have been identified. Which are you? Content King: values entertainment Social Clicker: values communications Fast Tracker: values news and information Everyday Pro: values online personal productivity tools Online Insider: […]

Learn More November 19, 2006

Er … Hats Off To Hooters?

Hooters (yes, that Hooters) just announced that the Gulfport (MS) Hooters was the top restaurant in the 430-location chain’s annual fundraising campaign on behalf of breast cancer research. The campaign overall raised about $135,000 from customers, to which corporate Hooters added another gift of $500,000. Not a bad day for breast cancer research. Kinda gives […]

Learn More November 4, 2006

<< 1 … 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!