• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Blog Post

The Charity “Membership” Ruse

Imagine you signed up for an annual gym membership in January and paid with a check (or cash for the Mafioso readers).  Now further imagine that you also signed up for the gym’s “healthy eating” monthly email. What does the term annual connote to you?  What about membership?  Would you expect to have the gym […]

Learn More December 4, 2015

Is your nonprofit a “watch, observe and guess” organization or a “listen and act” one?

Donor transactional data tells you zero about “Why” something happened.  Maybe the sector doesn’t care… All the quantitative data from your website, email marketing tools, direct mail response data….opens, clicks, visits, time on site, response rate, conversion rate, social media shares and on and on and on. Al those reports slicing and dicing and creating […]

Learn More October 7, 2014

Stop the Direct Mail Testing

Is your direct mail testing on auto-pilot?  Are you testing out of habit?  We hear a lot of very smart, sophisticated direct marketers working for big non-profit brands tell us this. If you are one of them it is time to get off the merry-go-round and stop testing (with the current approach). These same marketers […]

Learn More September 25, 2014

The average UK charity is losing out on a 105% increase in lifetime value

Every year you spend time, money and resource trying to engage your donors in the hope that they’ll give more and stay longer. Yet frustratingly little ever changes for the better (though frequently for the worse!) Why’s nothing changing? Because our journeys are starting in the wrong place. Take your current ‘supporter journey’. What was […]

Learn More March 14, 2014

Why Your Analytics Is Costing You Time and Money

Modeling (or analytics) for selection is way overrated and much of the time it doesn’t beat a simple RFM bucketing in Excel.  What the sector really needs is a model for understanding but more on that in minute. The modeling (or analytics) for selection is about using transactional – and perhaps demographic or lifestyle data […]

Learn More February 3, 2014

Strategy Starts Where Your Comfort Level Ends

But, alas this is not how strategy is typically done. To start, we turn “strategy” the noun into an adjective (strategic) modifying “plan” or “planning”. This fateful, unintentional decision likely dooms any real strategy emerging. Instead, we end with a long, tedious document and an Excel file. The Excel document is some form of a […]

Learn More January 29, 2014

Donor Surveys are Crap. Or Are They?

We here it all the time from people with, as best we can tell, absolutely no background in survey research or quantitative analysis whatsoever.  Many of these people mask this lack of knowledge with an often wrong, never in doubt tonality. On the flipside, and in their defense, they have likely come across some really […]

Learn More November 4, 2013

A Dangerous Myth – Over-solicitation causes poor retention.

We don’t typically name names in these posts.  However, on occasion, it is required.  Penelope Burk, of Cygnus Research makes this claim,  “Over-soliciting and insisting on unrestricted gifts are largely why 65% of donors who make a first gift never make a second and why 90% or more donors who start giving are gone within […]

Learn More September 30, 2013

Stop trying to beat the control. Just build a better one to start with.

Snickers.  Tide Detergent.  Cheerios. What images do these branded products conjure up?  A candy bar, sure.  How about the color of the packaging?  Brown for Snickers, red for Tide, yellow for Cheerios. You may not even be a candy bar consumer and yet it’s likely you have a reasonably good recall of what the Snickers […]

Learn More July 11, 2013

Non Profit Premiums Are Literally Crack Cocaine – the Why and How of Stopping the “Drug Trade”

The Economist publication was first published in 1843 with the stated mission of “taking part in a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress”. Harsh?  Maybe.  Accurate?  Absolutely. A similar contest exists between academia and the real world, with the former having answers too many of the […]

Learn More February 6, 2013

<< 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!