• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Blog Post

Tips from commercial sector on Facebook engagement

Virtually every nonprofit has a Facebook page and most are probably still experimenting with content, metrics or both. There is some interesting research (from a Sept 2011 report from Buddy Media, NYC) on what works and what doesn’t to drive retail couponing on Facebook.  This is all about getting clicks, which is an outcome any […]

Learn More February 7, 2012

Want to know what donor centric should look like?

  This is a fantastic Rorschach test for nonprofits (courtesy of a London based shop, Targetbase Claydon Heeley). What do you see on the left side?  What do you see on the right side?  If the answer to the both has the words “cute” and/or “funny” then you’re human.  If both responses do NOT include […]

Learn More February 2, 2012

What is Important To Your Donors? Is This Even the Right Question?

What is important to your donors?  What keeps them as donors? Is the answer to these two questions the same?  Our answer is a definitive “it depends”. What is important can be very different if asked in a vacuum or depending on the context provided.  We’d argue however, that while asking in a vacuum is […]

Learn More February 1, 2012

Is using the statistical average bad non profits?

Can a statistic be bad?  Maybe an overstatement but the Average, a universally used (but maybe not fully understood) statistic can sure hide a lot.  And without assigning malice or intent to the “hiding”, reliance on the average as an input to decision making can result in lots of bad outcomes. There are countless examples […]

Learn More January 24, 2012

The Problem with Donor Satisfaction Programs are…the Very Satisfied

How is that blog headline for a man bites dog storyline?  This seemingly ridiculous claim becomes more credible if you consider, Customer (or Donor) satisfaction programs are mostly about remediating bad experiences. Most corporate entities use customer satisfaction to evaluate a given, isolated experience – e.g. a shopping trip, a call center interaction, an in-person […]

Learn More January 12, 2012

What Makes Good Donors – Nature vs. Nuture?

Does anyone believe good donors are born versus created?  That some are inherently and fatalistically destined for philanthropic greatness while others are naturally predisposed against it?  Before you dismiss out of hand, there is some evidence that there is distribution for empathy and most folks have an “average” amount while other, smaller groups are at […]

Learn More December 13, 2011

Will anything get nonprofits more focused on retention? Doesn’t look like it…

Many have already blogged on a recent report from Adrian Sargeant (produced as part of a recent Blackbaud Summit). The report, a series of recommendations based on input from a wide variety of sources, is worthy of repeated reference. At DonorVoice, there is one recommendation worthy of reprinting in full along with some color commentary. […]

Learn More November 21, 2011

Struggling with donations? To (mis) quote Carville, It is the brand, stupid.

A recent Harvard Business Review article, well written as usual, persuasive as usual, is nevertheless, an echo of likely thousands of articles and books before it.  The bold headline, “The Cure for the Non-Profit Crisis”, boils down to one central, oft-cited, oft-repeated admonition, Strategic focus is the key to success.  They use the term “coherence”, […]

Learn More October 14, 2011

1st gift to 2nd gift chasm – Why it exists and how to fix it.

Why is there such a precipitous fall-off between first and second gift, all but guaranteeing a negative rate of return on some 60% of first time donors?  There are a lot of answers to this question, many having to do with specific cultivation approaches and warnings to follow or not follow at one’s peril. And […]

Learn More October 11, 2011

Why are Major Gift Donors More Committed to Your Cause? Their Social Status, in part.

There is an interesting study, summary published here, that finds those high in social status are naturally more trusting of others.  Those high in social status also tend to be more affluent, be in a higher socioeconomic status and in general, be the types of donors you target for major giving. They may also be, […]

Learn More October 5, 2011

<< 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!