• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Good Update On Mobile Giving

Mark Phillips at Bluefrog has done us a service with this update on mobile giving, with a UK slant. He links to a presentation from JustGiving.com indicating that 20% of UK charities are using mobile fundraising in some fashion. JustGiving itself receives almost 24,000 visits a day from mobile devices, up 82% in 2011 alone […]

Learn More July 18, 2011

Different Shapes And Sizes

When I read the comments Agitator readers make on our posts, I realize the huge diversity of our readership. I just finished ‘moderating’ two recent comments that indicate the huge spread in reader interest and focus. Both are brief, so I’ll re-publish here to underscore a point. Comment #1 from Kristen Smith at People For […]

Learn More June 14, 2011

Twitter Update From Pew

I’m alerting you to this report reluctantly, because I’m a Twitter avoider. But Pew Research says 13% of online Americans — 19% in the biggest using 25-34 year-old cohort — now use the service, so I guess it’s my duty. Usage goes up with education! UGH! Tom

Learn More June 13, 2011

The Social Habit

The Social Habit is a study of social media usage by Edison Research and Arbitron. Some interesting findings … 52% of Americans 12+ have a profile on one or more social networks. This figure is driven largely by Facebook, which is now used by over half (51%) of Americans 12+. Twitter is as familiar to […]

Learn More June 10, 2011

5 Stages Of Social Media Growth

Here is an interesting — and a bit amusing — depiction of social media evolution in large organizations, as seen by research firm Forrester. The process of ‘social maturation’ for social media utilization … 1. Dormant stage — one in five companies don’t use social media. 2. Small victories — baby steps and case studies. […]

Learn More June 8, 2011

‘Cause Fatigue’ On Social Media?

Interesting new research on causes and social media from Georgetown University’s Center for Social Impact Communication, reported in Philanthropy Today. While four in ten Americans get involved with groups working on social and political causes, 17% of women and 12% of men do so through social media sites, by joining a cause group, posting a […]

Learn More May 24, 2011

Facebook Versus Real Money

Yesterday we noted Facebook’s new Resource section for nonprofits, and quoted FB’s own figure of $5 million being raised through its Causes application. Laudable. But one Agitator reader noted with a hint of sarcasm … $5 million in five years from some 50 million Facebook users wasn’t exactly a fundraising avalanche! Then another commentator noted […]

Learn More May 20, 2011

Facebook Help For Nonprofits

Facebook has added a new Resource section to help nonprofits optimize the engagement impact of their Facebook presence. Says Facebook: “This Page is a resource for non-profits and other organizations for social good. We built it to help you harness the power of Facebook and bring positive change to the world. Facebook empowers non-profits by […]

Learn More May 19, 2011

Are You A Fundraising Fox, Or Hedgehog?

That’s the question raised by Damian O’Broin, as featured in the latest update from SOFII. He relates the old ‘fox versus hedgehog’ story, in which the dowdy hedgehog day-after-day outwits the flashy, cunning fox … who always has a plan, but never learns. Damian uses the story to make a point about the unglamorous work […]

Learn More May 10, 2011

Two Online Campaigns We Like

Our content has been pretty heavy the past few days. This is a bit lighter. Just two campaigns we’ve noticed and like. From Greenpeace, a Facebook campaign, targeting Facebook … Unfriend Coal. Read about it in this article from the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Over 80,000 comments in 24 hours … possibly the Facebook world record. […]

Learn More April 22, 2011

<< 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 … 43 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!