Cool Data For Alumni Fundraising
The Agitator has heaps of .edu readers whom we don’t frequently address specifically.
So we’re happy to jump on the opportunity to alert you to the CoolData blog, which specializes in advice on making the most of your alumni data for fundraising purposes.
Here’s an example of their analysis of alumni website behavior.
Happy to receive your feedback on the blog.
Tom
One response to “Cool Data For Alumni Fundraising”
Behavioral Science Q & A
Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]
Read Full Answer
Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]
Read Full Answer
When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]
Read Full Answer
There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]
Read Full Answer
What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]
Read Full Answer
That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]
Read Full Answer
Thanks for the mention. The paper you’ve linked to was co-written by data mining experts Peter Wylie and John Sammis. It’s worth noting that many of the examples of analytics insights posted on the blog are perfectly transferable to the “non-edu” sector, this paper included. I think anyone involved in fundraising in a senior position who chooses to ignore whatever data they might have on interactions with their constituents (including online interaction) should lose their jobs. The days of relying solely on a combination of past giving history and throwing darts at the board are over.