Direct Mail Hanging In
The Direct Marketing Association notes in its recently released 2012 Response Rate Report that direct mail response rates have dropped nearly 25% over the past nine years. Even so, direct mail pulls a better overall response than digital channels.
The report also says that:
- Cost per order or lead for acquisition campaigns were roughly equivalent for direct mail ($51.40), post card ($54.10), email ($55.24), and paid search ($52.58).
- Email had the highest ROI (28.5), compared with 7.00 for direct mail.
- The highest response rates—nearly 13 percent to a house list—was produced by telephone marketing. Telephone marketing also had the highest costs: nearly $78 per order or lead for a house list, and $190 for a prospect list.
For the 53% of Agitator readers who have been in the fundraising biz less than ten years, yes, telemarketing lives!
Tom
6 responses to “Direct Mail Hanging In”
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer
With mail’s response rate being so high, and email’s ROI winning, it’s interesting that the DMA emailed the survey 🙂
As a fundraiser we’re always very interested in the costs of acquistion. However there does seem to be a big discrepency within these US numbers. The cost of an order (or donation) at $51 through DM is pretty good, closer to £60 in the UK. However the cost of a lead at $51 seems very step indeed. Better analysis needed me thinks.
Just wondering: Did the DMA split out “fundraising” as a category? And, if so, is the cost of a first donation the same as a first order ($51), etc.? The DMA press release talks about retail apparel and publishing/media, but doesn’t mention gifts. I worry about applying commercial (B2B and B2C) data to the weird, wacky world of asking people to give you money is return for a good feeling (or a trinket). And, of course, I’m too cheap to buy the full DMA report, so I’m hoping you did.
I’m thrilled to see this. I find myself defending the value of mail on a regular basis (why do I have to do this? Don’t people see where their revenue is coming from?).
I’m pretty sure I saw some statistics recently, but can’t remember where, that even most online non-profit giving is driven my mail.
Too bad we’re not better at actually tracking that.
Nice report. Interesting that highest response rates is for house list by telephone marketing.
I find ‘last touch point’ analysis (which I assume it is?) is less and less reflective of the real picture. Impact in today’s highly fragmented multiple touch point world needs to be analysed as a media mix not by single channel.
Hopefully this report is read with the understanding that it’s the right mix that’s important and relying on a single channel is risky.