Fundraising Metrics That Matter

June 29, 2017      Roger Craver

Yesterday I explored ‘vanity metrics’ and briefly explained why they’re not very helpful for serious decision-making. Or how, in the case of Benchmarking, they’re often ignored or mis-applied. Today, we’ll move to metrics that truly matter.

By my definition an important metric – a metric that matters – is one that triggers the “What-should-I-do-differently-to-improve?” question.

Preview of Your Free Bonus for Reading This Post. 

After I list and explain what I consider ‘must know’ metrics that matter, I’m going to provide a link that will enable you to quickly — and for free — analyze your own file or one of your client’s files in just minutes. This is a courtesy to Agitator readers from our sister company DonorTrends and I urge you to take advantage of their generosity. They’ll not only show you how to analyze your own file, but if you need help they’ll take the time to do that as well.

 

Key Metrics

Here are my picks for Fundraising Metrics That Really Matter because they lead us to ask key questions. Questions that, when answered, can dramatically improve the productivity of a fundraising program.

In my mind a ‘key metric’ is one that provides the sort of information that, if you act on it, will affect the value of your donor base. Much like the basic ‘vital signs’ of the human body — blood pressure, pulse, heart rate, BMI, etc. — key fundraising metrics will enable you to spot problems, see opportunities, and take action to improve your organization’s financial growth and sustainability. (Helpful resource: The Agitator Archives are packed with helpful articles, tips and case studies involving each of these metrics. Just go to Search Archives on the Agitator’s homepage, enter some search terms and …bingo! )

Number of New Donors Making Second Gift. This metric is a harbinger, if not a dead-on predictor of the retention rates and Life Time Value (LTV) an organization is likely to enjoy. Ask and correctly answer the question of how to get more second gifts and get them earlier and you’ll have a head start on a higher retention rate. But first you must find out how many new donors do and how many don’t make second gifts.

First Year Retention Rate. Tom and I have preached and preached about lousy retention rates and begged everyone to fix the leaky bucket of retention. It begins with the new donors, what we do to hold them, what we do to lose them. There are tons of questions and hypotheses you should be putting forth around this metric once you determine the number of new donors retained into the second year.

The flip side of the retention coin is ‘attrition’. Here the questions start with: “Why did so many donors leave?” Ask and answer this question by identifying (and correcting) the causes of defection and you’ll not only boost your bottom line, you’ll make your acquisition investment pay off faster and better.

Multiple Year Retention Rates. Same as above, but by tracking these year-by-year you can spot trends, problems and opportunities, because year-over-year comparisons of this metric will trigger additional questions and answers for improving your program.

Lifetime Value of a Donor (LTV). At the end of the day all the actions you take to improve retention, average gift and donor commitment will be reflected in the LTV value of each donor and all donors collectively. This is the Key Metric on which you can benchmark, guide and then track the success — or failure — of your intermediate and long term strategies.

Annual Metrics. Much like marking a child’s growth on a wall or door jamb year by year you’ll also want to track your annual improvements (or improvement opportunities). Here’re my choices and I think their labels are self-explanatory.  Each should trigger questions that lead to action. For example, if the ‘Number of Gifts per Donor’ is lower this year than last, then “What did we do differently this year compared to last year?” Or if the ‘Lapsed Reactivation Rate’ is higher this year than last, “What did we do differently this year, and should we be doing more of it?”

  • 5 Year Lifetime Value
  • Average Gift
  • Revenue per Donor
  • Number of Gifts per Donor
  • $ and or % of gifts that have been upgraded
  • Growth score (is your donor base growing or shrinking)
  • Lapsed Reactivation Rate

Now … Your Free Bonus. You can quickly and easily get each of the metrics above — and more — for your own file by going to this special Agitator/DonorTrends Sign Up Page to get started. It’s free and if you need help the folks at DonorTrends are standing by to assist you and answer questions. Your metrics and an analysis of your file will be ready in minutes.

Remember, what gets measured is usually what gets managed. So start measuring with metrics that really matter to your organization’s future.

Roger

 

4 responses to “Fundraising Metrics That Matter”

  1. Zach Shefska says:

    Roger, this is great! I remember you had previewed the DonorDashboard many months back. I am glad you’re sharing it once more. At Fundraising Report Card we’re trying to provide the same exact thing — access to key fundraising metrics (the ones that actually matter) in a simple, seamless and inexpensive way.

    Kudos to you and the DonorTrends team for following along and providing something for the community as well. The more nonprofit professionals have access to this type of information, the more likely they are to use leverage it in their day-to-day activities.

  2. Caity says:

    @Zach – thank you for continuing to help push the ‘Metric Movement’ forward. Every nonprofit practitioner should demand immediate and free access to basic intelligence that will help them make better decisions.

    Calculating metrics, however, is only the first step. How to turn all this ‘insight’ into ‘fundraising action’ is where we need to drive the conversation.

    How do we use data and turn it into useful information. How do we increase retention, upgrades, and reactivation?

    We implement a 3 step strategy to analyze past performance, identify opportunities, and target the file to raise more from fewer donors.

    I would love to hear how other Agitator readers are turning their donor data into dollars.

  3. Allison says:

    Thank you for this info, Roger!

    Can you please explain the difference between the “Number of New Donors Making Second Gift” and the “First Year Retention Rate”? How are these metrics different/telling us different things?

    Thanks!

  4. Roger Craver says:

    Good question Allison,

    The sooner a new donor makes a second gift the more likely she/is to become a more valuable donor. That is why sophisticated acquisition programs have “second gift strategies” built into them. Their goal is to get a donor to give as soon after the initial gift as possible. The metric “Number of New Donors Making Second Gifts” is the measure to see whether second gift strategies are working well, or whether they need to be improved.

    The “First Year Retention” rate simply tells us how many of the folks who made their first gift in Year One continued giving in Year Two. For purposes of calculating this metric it doesn’t matter how many gifts the new donor made in Year One, the purpose of this Retention metric is to alert us how many of these donors stayed with us into Year Two, regardless of the number of gifts made in Year One.