Good News for Relief Organizations, Bad News for Others
The just-released Target Analysis Group's Quarterly Index of National Fundraising Performance delivers good news to international relief organizations — and some not-so-good-news for other sectors.
First the bad news. According to the Index donor counts show a 2.5% drop for the first two quarters of '06 compared to 2005. Retention rates fell by 3.3%. Reactivation rates by 5.0% and new donor acquisition dropped by 8.2%.
According to the Target Analysis Group the overall decline is due principally to two factors: the decline in acquisition of new donors and a decline in the retention and reactivation of multi-year donors.
Although the average amount given by individual donors increased 3% in this period the decline in numbers of donors has resulted in an essentially flat year-over-year revenue stream with only a paltry 0.4% growth over the same period a year ago.
But…there's particularly good news for international relief organizations who were dramatically and positively affected by the Asian Tsunami giving in December 2004 that led to large increases in acquisition, retention and reactivation in the first half of 2005. Although these organizations have seen their revenue decline, the Index shows that their revenue has appeared to have plateaued “at a much higher level than it would have without the disaster. “
In fact, at the end of the 2nd Quarter of 2006 the revenue for the relief sector is up a whopping 51% compared to 8% for the overall Index. Seems as though some of these groups are doing something right.
To compile the Index, the Target Analysis Group evaluates the transactions of nearly 70 leading non-profits, their 39 million donors, and more than 70 million gifts totalling more than $1.9 billion.
And here's what's happening in other sectors.
Continue reading “Good News for Relief Organizations, Bad News for Others”
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer