Green, Greed, Greenwashing … Or Good?
A robust debate is occurring within the enviro community regarding the green epiphany of Wal-Mart, the second-largest corporation (after ExxonMobil) in the world in terms of revenue.
David Roberts at environmental hub Grist, wonderfully refers to Wal-Mart as “every green's favorite source of cognitive dissonance.” He has editorialized very thoughtfully on Wal-Mart's apparent conversion and is presiding over a running online dialogue on the pages of Grist that all enviros — and other nonprofit strategists — should follow and think about.
On the one hand, Environmental Defense (with whom I consult) has gone so far as to set up satellite offices in Benton, Arkansas to be on-the-scene at Wal-Mart headquarters, while WWF has ten staffers assigned to the Wal-Mart case. Their attitude — one I'd term “cautious engagement” — is typified by the comments of ED President Fred Krupp in this recent USA Today article:
“Wal-Mart has as much or more potential than any other company to change the way the world does business,” says Krupp. “And we intend to be right there.”
In his view, Wal-Mart is “off to a promising start” but will be judged by “the results of its efforts.”
BTW, this article provides an excellent overview of Wal-Mart's enviro initiatives, as well as the views of skeptics, like WakeUpWalMart:
“We don't know whether Wal-Mart's environmental changes are real or a Machiavellian attempt to green-wash a declining public image,” says Chris Kofinis, communications director. “But its long record of irresponsible behavior forces one to be skeptical.”
Many of the enviro activists commenting on Wal-Mart in Gristmill are much farther out on the hostility scale. These folks are emotionally, intellectually, philosophically, even spiritually anti-corporate. And Wal-Mart is their lightening rod.
How this high profile case of corporate conversion plays out has huge implications, and not just for the environment. Here's why …
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer