Happy New Year!
Agitators in Australia and New Zealand, China, India and Thailand (most of the planet) are already into the New Year, while those in Europe, the U.K. and North and South America are still in their New Year’s Eve mode.
No matter where you’re receiving this Agitator signal we wish you all the best in the brand new year. May 2015 bring you blessings that matter.
In New York City, at midnight introducing the 1st, the 12,000-pound crystal ball will drop in Times Square.
This year, for the first time, a charity will be designated as an official partner of the Times Square New Year’s Eve celebration that will be watched by more than a billion folks worldwide.
As Holly Hall reports in The Chronicle of Philanthropy, that charity is the International Rescue Committee.
Founded in 1933, at the request of Albert Einstein, a refugee himself, to aid refugees and those displaced by war, persecution or natural disasters, IRC seems to us to be a perfect fit for this honor.
2014 will go down as one of the worst years since WW II for refugees. As the rest of the world celebrates, more than 50 million people, mostly women and children, find themselves displaced.
At 11:59 Eastern Time tonight the president of IRC and four refugees will press the button signaling the countdown to 2015 and the lowering of the Times Square Crystal Ball.
As we all pause to think of the year ahead, let’s send an extra burst of hope to those fleeing the terror of conflict, war and persecution.
Happy New Year Agitators everywhere!
Roger and Tom
P.S. In case you’re glued to your computer/laptop/tablet/phone and not the TV you can follow the Times Square festivities here. And you can link to the New Year’s section of IRC’s website here.
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer