How to Make People Stop Doing Good Things: Ask for Money
Swedes are world-class recyclers, nearly 90% of bottles and cans get returned. It’s a habit and point of civic pride. Then researchers added one small twist to the recycling machines:
“Press here to get your deposit.”
“Or press here to donate it to charity.”
And the moment that donation choice appeared, recycling dropped and the drop persisted. This wasn’t about social pressure, no one was watching as the machines were off in a corner of the store. The machine didn’t judge them but they judged themselves. This faceless machine had created a moral choice and rather than chose, people bailed.
They’d rather throw the bottle away than stand in front of a machine that made them feel selfish. Let that sink in. The guilt created by being asked to donate and possibly choosing not to outweighed the habit, the culture and the guilt of throwing the recycling in the trash.
We see this in other research too:
-
People take alternate exits to avoid donation collectors
-
People don’t open the door when they know a solicitor’s coming
These aren’t stories about saying “no”, they’re stories about people avoiding the moment of choice altogether because that moment feels bad. And in fundraising, that moment is the ask. Not the framing, not the story or lack of it, not the quality or lack of it, the ask. We’ve conditioned donors to have anticipated guilt and they don’t need to give more than a nanosecond of attention to know what’s inside; a moral fork in the road.
Recycling didn’t drop in Sweden because people became selfish. It dropped because a moment of moral tension hijacked a good habit.
If your donor experience feels like that, a series of moral tests, you’ll eventually get the same result: Not a “no,” but a slow fade into avoidance.
So skip the guilt trip, give people,
- A full, complete story to show moral clarity by showing what success looks like and that it’s achievable
- Give people agency. Your soft ask ain’t soft enough. You’re machine gun fire of asking in single appeal or phone call or face to face interaction might win the battle but will definitely lose the war. Think less “We need you now!” and more “Here’s how you can help, if you’re ready.”
- Prime their Identity and personality – this turns internal guilt into internal alignment by matching the desired action with who I am. Not who you want to be, who I already believe I am.
Kevin



Thanks as always for your thought-provoking posts, Kevin.
Are you suggesting that we shouldn’t make asks of major donors? Do you know of any data where EDs or MGOs split a caseload and made “Could you increase your gift to $25,000, Edith, to help X happen?” vs. “If you’d like to give to support X, Edith, that would be great.”
You might know the Millard Fuller quote, ““I have tried raising money by asking for it, and by not asking for it. I always got more by asking for it.” That’s been my experience, but I don’t know if there’s data to back it up.
Thanks again!
Hi Valerie,
Thanks for reading and commenting. I’m certainly not suggesting that we stop asking. I am suggesting that whether you are asking a rich person to give a lot or a much lower income person to give a little, the requirements to make that ask successful are the same. And “success” is not getting a yes, success is having that person feel very good their choice and want to do it again. This requires three needs being met,
1) Agency. A sense of autonomy and choicefulness. Rich and not rich are much more alike than different but there are subtle differences. One is that, on average, rich people assign even more value to their sense of agency.
2) Competence. Do they think the giving decision is/was a good one?
3) Relatedness. Do they feel a sense of connection to cause, beneficiary, brand?
One of the best ways to pull off 1 and 3 is to tailor the ask (mass mkt or 1 to 1) to the person’s values and goals. We use Identity and trait tailoring in our mass market work but any major gift office worth their salt is doing something akin to this in their conversations and relationship building. We know our best callers and door canvassers (I have a company that does this too) are those that innately pull this off and then we try to train the rest to replicate.