Is Your Website Lost In The Crowd?
Roger sent me this press release the other day, with the short message … "Talk about competition!"
The release notes that there are now over 7 million organizations with websites using the .ORG domain (ranking 3rd behind .COM and .NET). This number has been growing at the rate of 20% per year over the past five years.
Public Interest Registry, the outfit with stewardship over the domain, attributes the growth to interest in social networking, issue awareness, personal blogging, online political organizing and issue advocacy.
Your nonprofit website faces a lot of competition and clutter out there in the digital space. Perhaps you need to pay more attention to how compelling it is and how your target audience views and responds to it.
Here’s one set of suggestions, from web consultant Tim Ash, on how you might go about assessing the main landing pages that receive most of your traffic. Options include web analytics (in depth stats on site usage), useability reviews, focus groups and surveys, analysis of "help" calls and emails, even eye-tracking.
How much should you invest in website assessment? Hmmm. How important is it not to get lost in the crowd? How important is it, with all the resources you put into the site, to have 90%+ of most visitors leaving without a trace, or spending nanoseconds on it?
Tom
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer