• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Meet the Practitioners

Erica Best, Associate Director, Direct Response, No Kid Hungry

Larissa Peters

Larissa Peters is the Digital Giving Manager at Catholic Relief Services. She received a BA in English at Simpson University and an MA in Intercultural Ministries at Canadian Theological Seminary. Prior to Catholic Relief Services, she worked in the marketing department at World Relief and was a case manager for refugees in Atlanta.

Larissa joined CRS six years ago and is responsible for raising online revenue for the Annual Giving program through digital channels including web, email, ads, social media, text/SMS and search. She develops strategic initiatives regarding donor acquisition, email response and donor retention, and therefore delving into behavioral science and a/b testing is a must in her role.

 

 

Derek Roberts

Crisis is the national charity for single homeless people. We are dedicated to ending homelessness by delivering life-changing services and campaigning for change. Our innovative education, employment, housing and well-being services address individual needs and help homeless people to transform their lives.

As Direct Marketing Executive, Derek is responsible for communicating the message of the charity to warm and cold donors through year-round appeals as well as the annual Christmas Appeal. His focus has been to develop the online experience and journey that the donor has with Crisis and has become a key point of reference in the Fundraising Team not only for online/email developments but also for the application of behavioural science insights that the Direct Marketing Team utilises in their offline and online appeal creative.

 

Rami Sarakbi

Rami Sarakbi has worked with the Canadian Red Cross since 2014 where he has assumed a variety of roles from frontline aid worker during the Syrian refugee crisis in Europe, to a national coordination role during the Alberta Wildfires in 2016.

Currently, Rami works with the fundraising team as part of the Customer Experience (CX) Unit. The CX Unit develops donor journeys based on analytics and market research, viewed from the donor’s perspective. The purpose of these journeys is to deliver increased net revenue and optimize channel use and cadence use. When a donor is at risk or is going down a path/journey associated with a negative outcome, the CX team searches for ways to intervene proactively

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!