Memorial Day: What We Owe the Young
Look at any cemetery on Memorial Day, and you see a quiet sea of stone. But look closer, and you see the true weight of the day: it is a holiday paid for almost entirely by the young.
For older generations, these rows of white markers evoke a sacred era of collective duty—a time when country meant a shared promise, and defense of that promise was an absolute, unquestioned honor. For younger eyes, shaped by decades of complex, distant conflicts, the view is different. They see the devastating cost. They see the individual human tragedy of nineteen- and twenty-year-olds whose entire futures were traded away for our present.
Both perspectives hold an essential truth. Memorial Day isn’t about glorifying the machinery of war; it is about remembering the staggering price of peace and freedom.
Whether we view this day through the lens of institutional reverence or profound skepticism, we arrive at the same moral crossroads: we inherit a debt to those who never came home. And the only way to truly honor a life cut short is to fiercely protect the democracy they were sent to defend—and to relentlessly seek an impossible ideal that is nevertheless worth seeking, a world where sacrificing the young isn’t needed.
Roger and Kevin
Behavioral Science Q & A
Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]
Read Full Answer
Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]
Read Full Answer
When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]
Read Full Answer
There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]
Read Full Answer
What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]
Read Full Answer
That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]
Read Full Answer