Missions Versus Plans
A very short post from Seth Godin, called There’s nothing wrong with a plan.
Godin says:
Plans are great.
But missions are better. Missions survive when plans fail, and plans almost always fail.
The Agitator says:
Nonsense. Boy, does he annoy me sometimes!
Missions are a dime a dozen. Saving children from poverty is a noble mission. Thousands of nonprofits and NGOs work on this mission. Some of them have far superior plans than others. Those are the ones who deserve donor support.
From a donor’s perspective, the mission is a given. The differentiator is the plan or strategy for effecting change.
So I say missions are great. But effective plans are better.
And that’s why today’s donors — meaning the Boomers following all those duty-driven 65 years+ donors — are harder to please. They require more proof of effectiveness … results.
Perhaps you can still fundraise from a 65+ donor on the inherent strength of your mission … and maybe from a starry-eyed teenager via their social site page. But, I submit, that won’t work with most donors in between … and especially those adventuresome Boomers we’ve been talking about the past two days. They want to assess how you expect pull it off. They’ll accept some risk in your plan … but they want a plan.
What do you say … mission or plan?
Tom
P.S. Innovation and risk-taking is fine. They must be part of your game. That said, how many fundraising ‘plans’ of yours might go down the toilet before your boss or client ‘invited’ you to find a new mission?!
3 responses to “Missions Versus Plans”
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer
Mission …. Vision …. Plan ….. Strategy…. Case Statement …. Case for Giving … Strategy …. Tactic …. Tagline …. Teaser …. Ask …. Subject line ,,, Content … Catch Phrase …. Results ….
It all Comes down to:
WHAT are you going to do.
WHY are you going to do it.
WHO is going to do it.
HOW are you going to do it.
WHEN are you going to do it.
And …. DO I BELIEVE YOU CAN DO IT?
You need mission, values, a plan, and way to account for whatever happens when you put your plan into effect.
While this is persuasively written, isn’t it a bit like the chicken/egg debate? You can’t sustain a mission without a plan. You don’t need a plan without a mission. If you know where you’re going, you need to pick a route. If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.
I was going to adamantly argue for a mission over a plan (at least as a starting point) but Claire’s comment I think is spot on. You really need both.