More Reasons To Monitor Prez Campaigns
We periodically remind our nonprofit org readers to monitor and learn from the communications practices of the presidential campaigns.
So here's plenty to stretch your mind on a Monday morning.
Not everything these guys do is brilliant, but the campaigns are a hotbed of experimentation with new media approaches.
For example, here's a good Washington Post description of the text messaging exploits of the campaigns … Obama and Edwards are the ones to watch. Sign up yourself for a hands- (fingertips?) on peak at what's happening.
Here's a USA Today guide to the “best” political YouTube videos.
Here, courtesy of ClickZ News, is how campaigns are using search engine marketing to intercept hapless potential voters when they google. McCain's big on “campaign finance” and “stem cell research”; Edwards (a big, but not efficient, user) vies with Obama for “war in Iraq.”
Also as reported by ClickZ News, McCain is the frontrunner in terms of spending for conventional online display ads on sites like FoxNews.com, Yahoo, and conservative political sites, buying 8.7 million impressions in May. Lots of testing going on — sites, creative, messages.
And of course, there's online fundraising. Time reminds us not to forget Obama's 260,000 or so online donors … if they're worth Howard Dean's 2004 online donors — roughly $200 each — that's $52 MILLION predictable dollars in the bank! John Edwards should also have a steady supply of haircut money courtesy of his 100,000 online givers.
Get on the e-lists of some of these candidates. Become a guinea pig … it's for the cause!
Tom
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer