My Dog And Curvy Lines
My dog, like many dogs, instinctually turns around in circles before lying down. These instincts predate centuries of domestication and have no modern day value. And yet, it’s part of her unconscious routine.
Humans have similar unconscious, evolutionary quirks and preferences. For example we instinctively prefer curves over angles. This could be rooted in the innate roundness of a baby’s face as we tend to associate curvy with friendliness, softness, and approachability, while sharp angles induce associations of toughness, hardness, and avoidance.
Approach and avoid, much like fight or flight are pretty hard-wired. What makes the buttons on the right different from those on the left? Yep, curvy or sharp angles.
A range of experiments on commercial websites showed increases of 20%-50% with curvy buttons beating sharp on click through rate, conversion and number of items put in the cart (i.e. value). There was a survey component that confirmed people considered the rounded buttons more aesthetically pleasing.
More pleasing promotes more liking which promotes more “approaching” behavior. Eye-tracking confirms the rounded buttons got more and longer gazes.
When does this preference not hold up or matter? Any call to actions that are likely associated with ‘negative’ behaviors and are avoidance motivated – e.g., opt-out, unsubscribe, cancel. In those instances the button shape makes no difference.
Kevin
Ask A Behavioral Scientist
Behavioral Science Q & A
Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]
Read Full Answer
Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]
Read Full Answer
When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]
Read Full Answer
There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]
Read Full Answer
What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]
Read Full Answer
That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]
Read Full Answer

