No More Grumpy Fundraisers
Each day for the past 10 years Tom and I have pored over dozens of blogs, papers, presentations and speeches prepared by scores of fundraisers. Not only are we witness to the daily parade of good and bad ideas in our trade, but it’s a terrific way to keep up with changing times.
So it was with a touch of sadness and lots of appreciation that I opened the blog post from UK fundraiser Peter Maple to be greeted with The Last Post—An End to the Grumpy Old Fundraiser.
For 7 years and in 150 posts Peter has ruled the kingdom known as the Association of Grumpy Old Fundraisers who know stuff — from which he dispensed advice, insights and grumbles on the state of fundraising.
Now he’s moving on — no longer ‘grumpy’ he claims — but continuing to offer advice, teaching and cajoling.
I for one will miss his posts and his periodic criticisms and comments fired into my private email box.
He closed his last post offering advice he received from “a gruff Yorkshireman”: “Peter, you’ve got two ears and one mouth, so use them in that proportion.”
Thanks for everything Peter. We’ll be listening.
Roger
P.S. Peter says he’s not going to be silent or withdraw from our trade. He’s just no longer “grumpy”. You can reach him at Kew Quorum.
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer