Political Fundraising As It Should Be
Last week I received an excellent email fundraising appeal from John Edwards.
Whatever your candidate preferences, this appeal deserves high marks — and your attention — for two reasons. You can view the effort here.
First, it illustrates smart use of online video technology, in this case leveraging the enormous reach of YouTube and involving prospective donors directly in the object of the appeal … producing and delivering a TV commercial opposing President Bush's stance on Iraq and his veto of legislation mandating date-certain withdrawal.
Respondents of course can preview the TV spot. But also, they can get directly involved and use their own webcams to add their own “We the people …” video message to the online version of the commercial.
Second, and more importantly, Edwards' appeal is grounded upon very intelligent fundraising psychology. It recognizes that most donors are indeed driven by passion over issues.
In this fundraising appeal, Edwards is “riding the issue” … as is totally appropriate.
He's not pushing his character, his record, his need to make a good showing in the next FEC report. He's tapping anger and exasperation that people feel about an issue and about — as they perceive and feel it — a wrong-headed and unresponsive President. And, along the way, he's positioning himself as our champion … voicing our concern in a TV ad, not about him, but about our issue.
Not surprising he was an effective trial lawyer! Well done John Edwards.
Tom
P.S. One day after first e-appeal, I've received a second one announcing “Goal Met” and seeking funds to expand the effort. Isn't it nice when good theory is rewarded by good results?
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer