This Headline Terrified Me

May 25, 2011      Admin

Charity Wins Donors With Promise Never to Ask For Another Gift

When I saw this headline on Holly Hall’s Chronicle of Philanthropy article on Monday I groaned out loud, and added an expletive.

What a recipe for fundraising disaster, I thought. No way direct response fundraising works without repeat gifts (i.e., repeat solicitations).

Then I read the article, which is about the prospecting approach used by Smile Train.

Their top-performing prospect package includes this pledge on the outside envelope …

“Make one gift now and we’ll never ask for another donation again.”

Great attention-getter … appealing to the ‘dark side’ (from a fundraiser’s perspective) of many donors’ instinctive reluctance to open the door to a barrage of ‘unwanted’ pitches.

But what follows, once the intrigued prospect looks inside the package and is moved to make their ‘only one’ gift, is clever. As reported by Holly:

“Donors who respond to the mailing are given a reply slip with which they can tell the charity they never want to be asked for a donation again, they want to receive limited communications from Smile Train, or they would like regular updates from the charity.”

That’s a smart twist on the permission marketing principle.

Assuming Smile Train is good on its word, and does not solicit those who opt out, the reality is that many — probably even most — responders will not opt out. They in fact choose to remain engaged … and like the fact that they were asked … more goodwill.

And even those who do opt out will get a non-solicitation ‘Thank you’. And guess what, an appreciable percentage will respond with a second gift! Plus, the remainder who have explicitly opted out are likely to represent the lion’s share of those initial givers who would not have responded to further solicitation anyway … Smile Train has saved the expense of re-soliciting them fruitlessly.

Smile Train didn’t share any of those opt in/opt out or ‘Thank you’ response figures in the article. But I’ll bet a month’s pay … this prospecting approach is working for them because of repeat gifts! Permission granted.

I’m OK. I’ve calmed down now.

Tom

3 responses to “This Headline Terrified Me”

  1. Hi Tom
    I had the same thought you did. So i did a test. Sent in one reply with my name giving permission to receive mail and one reply in my husband’s name asking not to receive any mail. We get exactly the same mail. SmileTrain, at least in our case, is not honoring their commitment.

    Phyllis

  2. Anita Robertson says:

    However, if one replies to Smile Train that their charity is NOT one that one wishes to give to (for whatever reason – in my case I simply am committed to other issues) – one will continue to receive solicitations for ever! – So you have to give to get off the list! Seems extortive to me.

    I do not like their approach. And would never recommend it.

  3. Rich says:

    I actually think Smile Train has a wonderful campaign going on and I don’t mind getting something in the mail. What I do mind is people knocking on my door and calling my cell phone. But you want to send me a piece of mail or a card, no problem. I don’t like it, I throw it away. Done.