Three free Webinars in September 2016
Not only are we humans irrational, but we are irrational in predictable ways, with biases baked into our brains’ operating systems. Behavioral science can get more people to do better things without force or coercion – simply designing better choices can make a big difference.
These set of three free Webinars will address how to bring this science to bear to:
- Upgrade your donors with optimal ask strings
- Acquire high-value donors with asks for commitments of multiple gifts
- Keep donors by getting donors to opt in to our communications
These Webinars won’t just tell you the theory; they will talk about how to put the science into practice with steps you can take today to get more and more valuable donors.
And if you sign up for all three, you’ll be entered to win a free, live behavioral science audit of an online donation form or mail piece of your choosing. You can sign up here:
- The science of ask strings on Wednesday, September 14th at noon Eastern: DonorVoice’s newest staff member, Nick Ellinger, takes you through how to use the psychology of what you ask for to increase revenue and retention.
- Increasing your donors’ gifts per year on Wednesday, September 21st at noon Eastern: DonorVoice principal Josh Whichard puts his 15 years of nonprofit direct marketing experience to bear on how to create an effective multi-gift program.
- Using behavioral science to get people to opt in on Wednesday, September 28th at noon Easter: DonorVoice principal Kevin Schulman and chief behavioral scientist Dr. Kiki Koutmeridou, PhD, walk through designing choices that make people click or check YES.
All of these events will be hosted by The Agitator editor Roger Craver and are absolutely free.
Please sign up for all three events and get entered to win that free, live behavioral science audit of an online donation form or mail piece of your choosing!
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer