Time To Go To Jail?

November 27, 2017      Admin

It’s been years since I was tear-gassed, arrested and tossed in jail for something worth fighting for.  And the same holds for the leaders of most causes I support.

Is that a sign that most nonprofits have become too much a part of the establishment, too much a part of the problem?

In short, is it time for charities to become radical again?  Time to become unpopular again through the stances they take?  Time to go to war agains the status quo?

In a wonderfully provocative piece in  UKFundraising  titled The world Is anti-establishment now. But what are we?

Reuben Turner, the Creative Partner of Good Agency thinks “It’s time for charity CEOs to get arrested again.  It’s time to break the law again.  To do the things that have never been done before.”

Reuben argues that “radical thinking is now mainstream, in politics, in business and across the media—particularly online, where new media sources are amplifying voices of dissent and disaffection.”

The danger, he warns, is that by maintaining the go-along-to-get-along strategy of not rocking the boat many charities “are now seen as part of the broken establishment, not an antidote to it.”

The findings of  2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Global Report provide some support for Ruben’s argument. You don’t have to live in Trump’s America or the UK’s Brexit to know there’s widespread dissatisfaction with the state of the world.

The Edelman findings are backed up by other research including that done by the firms WolffOlins in cooperation with CitizenMe indicate that “right now, over half of the people surveyed think we should we should be creating radically new systems, compared to just 14% who believe we should be reverting to things past.”

Don’t kid yourself into whistling past the graveyard in the belief that only those damn Millennials think this way.  The belief survey I cited above isn’t limited to the young.  As the authors note, “It spans age groups, genders and countries. Even amongst the over 55s, where pessimism is the most rife—50% of over 55s have a negative outlook compared to 33% of 18-24s—the desire for radical change is clear.” [Emphasis mine.]

What is most notable in Reuben’s post are results in that WolffOlins poll is the fact that the disaffected majority are now “much more likely to look to business as an agent of change than the charitable sector.”

In that poll 41% of the respondents suggested businesses should bring about societal change.  36% favored ‘individuals going good’ and only 15% suggested that charities and social enterprises held the answers.

That change—probably radical change –is needed will come as no surprise to Agitator readers and, in fact, to anyone who can read the statistics of decline in our sector.

The 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer reflects the most troublesome trend—the breakdown of the public trust in nonprofits.

Here’s Edelman’s verbatim summary:

“The 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer reveals that trust is in crisis around the world. The general population’s trust in all four key institutions — business, government, NGOs, and media — has declined broadly, a phenomenon not reported since Edelman began tracking trust among this segment in 2012.

“With the fall of trust, the majority of respondents now lack full belief that the overall system is working for them. In this climate, people’s societal and economic concerns, including globalization, the pace of innovation and eroding social values, turn into fears, spurring the rise of populist actions now playing out in several Western-style democracies. 

“To rebuild trust and restore faith in the system, institutions must step outside of their traditional roles and work toward a new, more integrated operating model that puts people — and the addressing of their fears — at the center of everything they do.”

So, what’s the answer to rebuilding trust?

We’ll deal with some suggestions in posts this week.

Meanwhile, Reuben Turner offers his suggestions with the warning:  “If there is an answer, I’m not sure anyone wants to hear it.”

He goes on to recommend specific course of action and I’ve taken the liberty of summarizing these in bullet points.

  • “It’s for charities to get radical again.
  • “To stop cosying up to government, and…
  • “make some more unexpected partnerships—with businesses, with movements, with individuals.
  • “To stand for—and against—something again.
  • To speak the language of discontent, not reassurance.
  • “To tell the truth when no-one else does.
  • “To talk like humans do.
  • “To give people something to join, a way to make a stand, a chance to make an impact.”

And…this final word from Reuben, “Ironically, it’s time to get unpopular again.  It’s the only way to be popular now.”

We’re happily setting some bail money aside for radical CEOs even as we send an Agitator Raise along to Reuben.

Roger

 

 

 

5 responses to “Time To Go To Jail?”

  1. Yes. Yes. It’s an up and down thing.

    Ah, the olden days when nonprofits were more radical. And the other olden days when nonprofits backed off radicalism because of various threats and concerns…like no more government contracts, etc.

    Back and forth. Up and down. Feels like not as much public policy and advocacy work these days. And fears that our major donor who give major gifts won’t give major gifts if we ruffle their feathers. (I hate hate the term “major gifts” and “major donors.”)

    Do you and I have the courage to step up and speak out? Do the leaders of nonprofits — CEO, board members, etc. — have the guts to step up and speak out and…..??

  2. My big take-away from the Edelman Trust Barometer and other information like it is that our nonprofit brands — like corporate brands and government — are weak. People don’t trust our organizations and so if we want to mobilize people our communications/engagement/marketing/fundraising work has to be built upon the real voices of real people. The time for being clever is past. The time for amplifying the authentic voices of real people is here.

  3. Gail Perry says:

    Love this! And thank you for the rallying cry.

    First, let’s fire all the nonprofit board members who make decisions by committee and look backward not forward.

    Many times, it’s the board who is holding the nonprofit back. What do you say, Simone?

  4. I look around and I see a lot of radically innovative work that is already happening around the world through our sector, a lot in partnership, some from the top and a lot at the grassroots. To name a few in my own community: the resurgence of local farming and its delivery systems, green infrastructure, housing first, solar conversions, resistance to new fossil fuel plants, neighborhood supports to enable aging in place, salt marsh reclamation, activist artists, worker cooperatives, local community push back against oppressive policing, labor organizing of people of color at hotels, casinos, landscaping, construction and poverty-wage nonprofits, alternative economic analysis, progressives running for local and statewide offices, Native American occupation of land, or folks chaining themselves to banks or boycotting institutions that work against their interests.

    I get multiple alerts every day in my mailbox to join a local vigil or protest (there are more than enough issues these days), to give funds, to call or write to government officials, to show up and lobby at the statehouse or city hall. There is training happening for nonviolent direct action, for people’s journalism, for running for office.

    Then there are those organizations that have to take the gov’t funds, because the people they serve depend on them every day for food, and housing, and health care and community support because so few with great wealth see what is out there. How could they? They don’t live in the same neighborhood, go to the same schools, or parks or beaches or grocery stores or health care providers.

    You don’t have to look far for innovation. What we need to keep exploring in more brutally honest conversations recognizing the significantly fragile or nonexistent fund development capacity that exists in the movement you are discussing is how to help build significant fundraising infrastructure to move significantly financial investment into these innovative and radical models.

  5. Robert O'Keefe says:

    If you’re having trouble finding non-profit leaders who are espousing radical causes and risking… if not jail, at least being ostracized by their peers and neighbors, to make positive change, maybe you’re not looking at the right non-profits.

    Look at pro-life causes… people like Abby Johnson (And Then There Were None), Fr. Stephen Imbarrato (Priests for Life), and others.