Vote For Impact Prize
HURRY!
You only have until Noon (Pacific) on Monday April 2nd to vote for the winner of the Care2 Impact Prize, to be awarded at the April 5th Nonprofit Technology Conference.
The award recognizes individuals in the nonprofit sector who have made an outstanding impact on the field of online advocacy, online fundraising or both.
We like these criteria:
- Innovation. Has this person introduced valuable new ideas and approaches to the nonprofit sector?
- Influence. Has this person’s work produced a ripple effect to influence and benefit other professionals in the sector?
- “Impact Delta”. Is there a quantifiably large difference between the “before” and the “after” of this person’s work?
- Advancing The Cause. Did this person help accomplish something that advanced their cause(s) meaningfully?
The nominees are impressive indeed …
- Marc Sirkin – VP of Social Marketing & Online Fundraising at Autism Speaks
- Paull Young – Director of Digital at charity: water
- Nancy Lublin – CEO & “Chief Old Person” at DoSomething.org
- Geoff Handy – VP of Direct Marketing & Membership at Humane Society of the United States
- Vinay Bhagat – Founder & Chief Strategy Officer at Convio
Tough choice! But make one … vote here.
Win or lose, we’re giving them all an Agitator raise!
Roger & Tom
Behavioral Science Q & A
Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]
Read Full Answer
Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]
Read Full Answer
Interesting question. I had a quick look at the testing done on this topic. On the positive side, in all cases, over half of donors decide to cover the fee. In some cases, it goes as high as 65%. Not a negligible percentage at all. Here’s another test from iRaiser showing consistent results (see point […]
Read Full Answer
There’s just one thing to consider when designing a supporter journey: the supporter. More specifically, you need to take into account: Who the supporter is i.e. their identity, which is the reason they support this cause, and their personality, which describes the way they “see” and process the world. These will determine the kind of […]
Read Full Answer
I’m not an expert in this but a quick search surfaced this article on the effect of tax reforms on 2019’s charitable giving. The researchers didn’t find a reduction. Actually, they observed an “increase in charitable contributions in 2019, even with the lower tax rates and the dramatically smaller number of taxpayers who itemize their […]
Read Full Answer