Wise Words About Charities And Branding
The other day blogger Jeff Brooks headlined a post … How to kill your fundraising. And the answer he gave was: Investing in brand. Well, I thought that was one of the most annoying things I had ever heard from Jeff (who I regard very highly).
So I read on and discovered he was passing along the admonition of Sean Triner, another smart blogger. Sean’s original post was titled: The first of two good ways to destroy your individual fundraising. Now I was really juiced up!
So I read Sean’s post, and I came away thinking that neither title really did justice to the key point Sean was making. Here it is …
The two pearls here …
“Brand is not about how a charity ‘looks’ it is about how people experience that charity.”
This is the point Roger has been hammering away at in his retention series (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3). Retention is about donor attitudes. Attitudes are shaped by how donors experience and feel about the organization. The composite of those feelings/attitudes is — forgive me — your brand. Of course it’s important … and it requires tending.
“Good fundraising is good branding.”
Yes, a lot is communicated via fundraising activities … no question that all that messaging and story telling inherent in fundraising delivers an organizational image and shapes attitudes. But again, there are — or should be — heaps of other engagements with the donor that can have more value than all those fundraising messages. Things like donor service, transparency, surveying and other involvement opportunities (including donor-created content), non-fundraising communications.
I do disagree with Sean when he says “there is never a need for a charity to spend money on awareness for fundraising purposes”. Do I want my cause — and my organization’s pivotal association with that cause — mentioned positively and prominently in influencer media, the specialty media that covers my mission area, and social media? Of course I do. Fundraising messages will never create a need or issue out of thin air.
Yes, if I have the resources, I will invest in securing that exposure … even if just for a decent PR person and a well-promoted website. Would I raid my fundraising budget to do so (the scenario that most troubles Sean)? No. As Jeff Brooks says, to raise funds, you need to fundraise!
That said, fundraising tactics will only catch the attuned.
Tom
I totally agree – brand is about how our donors feel about our organization, not about how our logo or business cards look. Our staff has worked really hard to keep our name out there in the community – showing up is half the battle. It takes time, though. We don’t have the resources to do a branding campaign, per se, but we DO have the ability to show up, well represent the values and priorities of our organization, and to be good, engaged, active partners. That has gone a long way in helping to promote our brand to the larger community within the resources that we have. To our donors, we try hard to keep in contact and remind them of why they love our programs with the stories students share. I’d love to have more resources to do more, of course, but I’m proud of what we have been able to do on a shoe string.