• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Advocacy Fundraising

Forget Your Perfect Offering: What Two Fundraisers Taught Us About Courage and Craft

Once, when our Canadian readers were children, it’s likely that the voices of the CBC — the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation — filled the kitchen as breakfast was prepared. Clear, northern vowels. Unhurried questions. The quiet dignity of a country talking to itself. That voice — their voice — came dangerously close to being silenced. In […]

Learn More May 12, 2025

Silicon Valley, ActBlue, and the Great Unraveling

If irony were rocket fuel, we could launch the James Webb Space Telescope into the next galaxy—or ship Elon Musk to his beloved Mars. How else to explain the spectacle of Silicon Valley billionaires—men, yes, men– whose fortunes were built on science, data, and publicly funded research—now gleefully backing a political regime waging war on […]

Learn More May 5, 2025

2 Years After Dobbs: The Landscape of Support for Both Sides

            In 1973 Craver, Mathews, Smith & Co. launched the first direct response campaign for the National Rights Action League (NARL,)  now named Reproductive Freedom for All . That was the year Roe v. Wade was decided.             That was also the time 51 years ago when women could not […]

Learn More June 17, 2024

Correcting a $16 Billion Mistake

If you’re annoyed by the vortex of political hype, misinformation and just pure bullshit inundating your life please be aware: it’s about to get much worse. As we enter the general election season most Agitator readers unfortunate enough to live in “battleground states” will be increasingly inundated through all channels—tv, email, social media, radio, telephone, […]

Learn More January 24, 2024

Fundraisers Who Know vs. Fundraisers Who Care

     The Agitator spreads most of its digital ink covering the strategies, tactics, and trends in fundraising.   Among all these trees of technique it’s easy to lose sight of the forest called mission.      If you’re not motivated, captured, and deeply committed to the mission of your cause or movement it’s likely you’re […]

Learn More October 9, 2023

Deceptive? Manipulative? Brilliant? Destructive? You Decide.

           The post-Labor Day tide of political email is on the rise and, if the past is prologue, will reach its high water mark a year from now then very slowly ebb  toward Election Day 2024.              This growing digital dog-pile, excreted by local, state and federal candidates and PACs, will […]

Learn More September 5, 2023

“Because It Works, That’s Why.”

Perhaps it’s time to rethink the ‘because it works’ claim so often trotted out in defense of dubious, deceptive fundraising tactics; enter the political email season. Between April 1st and 19th of 2019 the presidential candidates (at the time) sent a combined 1,730 messages, more than 19 a day, to supporters.  In defense or explanation […]

Learn More April 10, 2023

Election ’22: Will the “Youth Vote” Matter?

Blue wave?  Red wave?  Tsunami or mere ripple?  With only hours to go before Tuesday’s Mid-Term elections the outcome is anyone’s guess.  There are almost as many “answers” as there are pundits prognosticating. One of the major unknowns is the wild card labeled “the Youth Vote.”  I say “wild card” because of this group’s historically […]

Learn More November 7, 2022

They Kill Puppies Don’t They?

Mercifully we’re into the final lap of  the 2022 midterm elections campaigns. Mercilessly the candidates, PACs, advocacy groups and scammers have relentlessly turned up the frequency and batshit crazy rhetoric of their digital appeals reinforced by even more annoying telephone texts.. If you contributed to one or two campaigns early in the season your involvement […]

Learn More October 10, 2022

What Fundraising Can Learn From Soccer Fans

Soccer (football for our non-US readers) fans are (in) famous for their fandom. During a 2002 Real Madrid vs. Barcelona match a Barcelona fan threw a pig’s head onto the field because he was so angry seeing a former player from his team wearing the white of Real. That fandom is an Identity, one causing […]

Learn More September 23, 2022

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!