Fundraisers Who Know vs. Fundraisers Who Care

October 9, 2023      Roger Craver

     The Agitator spreads most of its digital ink covering the strategies, tactics, and trends in fundraising.   Among all these trees of technique it’s easy to lose sight of the forest called mission.

     If you’re not motivated, captured, and deeply committed to the mission of your cause or movement it’s likely you’re not the best fundraiser you could be.  After wandering among our herd of fundraisers all these years I don’t care nearly as deeply about how much a fundraiser knows, compared to how much a fundraiser cares.

     I’m writing this as the U.S. celebrates National Indigenous Peoples Day.  A holiday meant to recognize the painful history Indigenous people have faced, to celebrate their communities. For many, a day of protest and resistance.

      As I thought about this post, I wondered what the U.S. Constitution says about Native Americans.  It mentions them just 3 times – all in the context of assuring the federal government will rule supreme. My brother Chip, spent a lot of his life working for Native American rights and their movement, I haven’t.

      Still curious, I turned to the Constitution to check the word count on a movement I’ve devoted 56 years to –women’s equality, reproductive rights, and the Equal Rights Amendment.

     It’s probably no surprise to anyone that the Constitution, crafted by 55 white men in 1787 doesn’t set out any fundamental law about pregnancy, uteruses, or fetuses.  However, what may shock or surprise some is there is no mention of women at all!

     Don’t take my word that women are missing from the Constitution.  That’s what the U.S. Supreme Court concluded in last year’s Dobbs decision that reversed Roe v. Wade  and has subsequently led extremists to pass laws where women in about half the U.S may be breaking the law if they decide to end a pregnancy.

     This is not a post about reproductive rights.  However, it is a post about the need for long-term commitment and persistence when it comes to working as a fundraiser in movements.  And the women’s rights movement which includes reproductive rights poignantly illustrates the need for both these traits.

     Nothing better chronicles the roller coaster nature of social change movements that the just-published 50 Years of Ms. :  The Best of the Pathfinding Magazine That Ignited a Revolution.

     Frankly, this book is both a remarkable history of past battles and a field guide for the fight that must be waged going forward if we are going halt the erosion of hard-won victories, retore rights lost, and advance to the point where women’s rights and equality –including their reproductive healthcare rights—at last win the permanent Constitutional protection through the Equal Rights Amendment.

     Anyone working or volunteering in a movement will quickly see from 50 Years of Ms. that significant change doesn’t occur overnight or even after a few years.  What it shows is that  victory is possible after decades of relentless organizing and campaigning, but also those victories (as in Roe v. Wade ) can be lost and have to be regained.

     We in Fundraising Land owe special attention and devotion to the cause of women’s equality .  Afterall:

  • Women make up 75% of the fundraising workforce in the U.S. and Canada
  • According to the AFP Salaries for professional fundraisers (2020 Average: $89,799) are 24% less than for their male peers. (The gap is slightly lower in Canada: 13%.
  • Even worse. The gap is even wider for Hispanic, Asian, or Blac, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC).  A gap nearing 34%.
  • Women represent 51% of wealth in America. And, according to Nonprofit PRO in high-net-worth household 84% of women are the primary decision-makers or joint-decision makers.

    It’s now been 100 years since the ERA was first proposed by the women’s rights movement and 50 years since it was introduced in Congress.  The ERA has now been ratified by the required 3/4ths of the States.   All that stands in the way of enshrining it as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution is passage of a Resolution in Congress.

     This victory is long overdue.

Roger

6 responses to “Fundraisers Who Know vs. Fundraisers Who Care”

  1. Bob Hartsook says:

    Roger, your thoughts are particularly of interest to me. Behind my success is an early recognition of the capacity, decision making and influence of women. One report I saw years ago is that 87% of all wealth is controlled by women. Yet from CEO’s, fundraisers, and volunteers I fight this concept that men control the wealth. Confidently, I had a large national nonprofit with a CEO who had this dated view of the role women played in funding. Waiting for the right chance to make my point, the organization dealt in donors of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    He was stunned to learn that 7 out of his10 top donors—top donor at the time was $77 million was a woman. Other women on the list were giving $60 million, $50 millions, etc. Nonprofits who ignore women ultimately pay for it because of the power and independent voice of women.

  2. Kim says:

    Thank you for this post.

  3. Gail Perry says:

    Yeah, Bob, nonprofits who ignore women donors ultimately DO pay for it. But, alas, they don’t even realize it.

    It’s the guys upstairs in the C-Suites, with dated views who think they have all the answers, and who are not inclined to consider other opinions. They all go their merry way, unaware of how much they are leaving on the table.

    Meanwhile the ladies just get wealthier. I’m actually surprised that so many women keep giving, even while being ignored.

    And Roger, thank you for bringing the women’s movement to the forefront. Deep bow to you for all your steadfast support – and leadership – of our movement!

  4. mary anne walker says:

    With sincere respect, and as a long-time reader and as a white woman fundraiser who cares deeply about reproductive rights — might there have been a better day to post about women in the industry? Why derail the conversation away from indigenous people on Indigenous People’s Day? or to perhaps talk about the intersection of those two identities?