• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Blog Post

Donor Commitment Recorded Webinar – Called “Breakthrough” by Relationship Fundraising Author Ken Burnett

Here is the recorded webinar of the DonorVoice and Agitator National Study on Donor Commitment.  Enjoy!    

Learn More September 24, 2011

We Got Donor Commitment Scores – want to see who is “Great” and “Poor”?

DonorVoice conducted an online, nationally (US) representative survey among 1200 recent (last 12 months), frequent (more than 2 gifts to cause based charities) donors. The survey responses were collected between July 6th and 15th.  The fielding process adhered to best practices to assure maximum coverage across all days of the week and times of day. […]

Learn More September 22, 2011

National Donor Commitment Study and proof of link between donor attitudes and behavior

Why We Embarked on This Project Everyone acknowledges there are significant issues with acquisition; namely costs going up, yields going down.  There are also significant issues with retention; namely there isn’t enough.   This is really two sides of the same coin; the increasingly expensive-to-acquire donor coming in has little motivation to stay. The financial argument […]

Learn More September 20, 2011

The Donor Retention Problem, Part 3, Strategy & Tactics to Increase Donor Commitment

How do you apply it the Commitment Model?  Strategically and tactically. 30,000 ft: Not everything that you do matters to increasing the Commitment levels of your donors and what does matter does not matter equally.  And we know from information processing theory that people cannot process a million things in order to form an opinion […]

Learn More September 19, 2011

The Retention Problem, Part 2, The Big & Little Picture Solution

The Big Picture Solution We know exactly how to measure the level of trust (we call it Donor Commitment) to your organization at the individual donor level AND how your organization can impact it with your marketing (direct or otherwise), communications and operations. Now indulge us a bit with more “white paperesque” context. Why do […]

Learn More September 16, 2011

The Retention Issue – Part 1, Finding Your Candles

Since DonorVoice is devoted to donor retention we thought it best to launch the blog with a series of posts laying out the problem as we see it and the solution.  This is Part 1 in a series. The Problem Everyone acknowledges there are significant issues with acquisition; namely costs going up, yields going down.  […]

Learn More September 10, 2011

<< 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!