• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Communications

Treasure Chest From Pew Research

Regular readers of The Agitator will know how impressed I am with the research and analysis provided by Pew Research, especially with regard to online trends, media habits, and the confluence of media and politics/advocacy. But you don’t need to rely entirely on The Agitator to get this data. In fact, Pew now offers direct […]

Learn More May 14, 2009

Demographics Of Social Nets

Expanding on an Agitator post of several weeks ago, here’s some fresh demographic data on social net usage from Harris Interactive. 5% of Americans online use Twitter, while 48% use Facebook or MySpace. No surprise … usage goes up with education, and down with age. For example, 74% of those ages 18-34 use Facebook or […]

Learn More May 7, 2009

Equal Time For Planned Giving

We have to confess that The Agitator does not do justice to the important area of planned giving. Now we don’t have to feel quite so guilty! Our colleague Phyllis Freedman of Continuum Planned Giving has begun The Planned Giving Blogger. She’s a pro. In case you don’t know Phyllis, here’s the official bio: "Phyllis […]

Learn More May 1, 2009

Latest Stats On Social Nets

There’s lots of fresh data floating around on usage of social nets. This summary from comScore indicates that MySpace, with 70 million visitors in February, is still the #1 site for online US adults, but Facebook at 57 million is growing fastest (77% in past 12 months, compared to MySpace’s 3%) and at that rate […]

Learn More April 20, 2009

Facebook’s Getting Wrinkles

I’ve been pre-occupied with Facebook lately, in part because its demographics are changing so rapidly. Here’s the current profile, as reported by MediaPost.com: "Facebook is aging fast. The number of U.S. users over 35 has doubled in just the last 60 days, according to new data from Inside Facebook. The burgeoning crowd of older users […]

Learn More March 31, 2009

Donor Loyalty – New Agitator White Paper

The Agitator has released the fifth in its new series of DonorTrends White Papers, based on our proprietary donor survey research. This paper, dealing with donor loyalty, is available only as a benefit for subscribers to The Agitator’s Premium Service. Our first two White Papers deal with generational trends and differences in giving; our second […]

Learn More March 17, 2009

Mommy Math

If moms are a key element of your target audience for fundraising or communications, read on. This article by Stephanie Azzarone, who blogs at Mom Market Trends, makes a key point. When moms are looking for advice, including on potential purchases, they prefer to talk to peers rather than experts. And this conferring with peers […]

Learn More March 5, 2009

Generations And Internet Use

Always "must read" for me are the reports from the Pew Internet Project on internet habits by generation. Here’s the latest, from which I’ve extracted a few factoids. Internet use by older generations: Age 55-59 – 71% Age 60-64 – 62% Age 65-69 – 56% Age 70-75 – 45% Over 75 – 27% I focus […]

Learn More February 11, 2009

Social Nets – A Fundraising Distraction?

First, the good news. A recent "must read" data memo from the Pew Internet Project reports that 35% of American adult internet users have a personal profile on an online social network site … four times as many as three years ago. More detail on the percentages of online folks who have a social net […]

Learn More January 20, 2009

Who’s Using The Internet, Anyway?

With pressure to reduce costs, direct response fundraisers will likely turn up the volume on their online solicitation efforts. So, who’s using the internet these days? Here’s the latest internet user profile from Gallup, using as the key barometer the percentage of Americans who use the internet more than one hour per day (though additional […]

Learn More January 15, 2009

<< 1 … 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    The Agitator Tool Box

    Ideas, applications, tools, processes, and case studies of break-through solutions in fundraising, including:



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!