• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Popular Posts in 2018: 7 Easy Retention Wins

First published on October 17, 2018 My local mechanic has a sign over his workbench: “I can explain it to you, but I can’t make you understand it.” Visions of that sign popped up as I worked on The Top Five Barriers to Retention post. That’s when it occurred to me that there are many well-intentioned folks […]

Learn More January 2, 2019

Popular Posts in 2018: The Slow, Painful and Costly Death of the Full Service Agency

First published on July 5, 2018. Four years ago In Part 5 of our Barriers to Growth series I raised the question of whether the “full service” fundraising agency has outlived its usefulness.  More pointedly I wondered whether in fact they’re actually a danger to the sector. Today, I’m revisiting this issue because, if anything, I’m […]

Learn More December 31, 2018

Popular Posts in 2018: Donors Are Ticked Off By Excess Solitication

First posted on February 1, 2018. Why do results decline as volume goes up? At a basic level, each new communication cannibalizes results from those communications around it.  Looking at one study here, researchers found that each additional mailing generated 1.81 Euro in revenues, but that 1.21 Euros of that was cannibalized from future mailings.  Thus, […]

Learn More December 28, 2018

Popular Posts in 2018: Direct Mail Not Yet Dead

Editor’s Note:  Between Christmas and January 7th The Agitator Global HQ is undergoing some renovation and renewal.  The bowling alley is being resurfaced which, in turn, produces a tornado of dust requiring a thorough cleaning of the library collection not to mention the work space of our poet-in-residence. Consequently, we’ve decided to use this period of renovation and renewal to repeat 5 of our most popular posts of 2018. If you’ve already etched these gems in your mind we hope you’ll share them with colleagues. And, as importantly, we urge you to send along any suggestions for […]

Learn More December 26, 2018

We Suggest You Have A Merry Christmas

  All of Us at The Agitator and DonorVoice  

Learn More December 25, 2018

The Agitator Christmas Tradition Continues

  For some it’s the Yule Log. For others, mistletoe, For still others, mincemeat pie. For us, it’s Christmas carols. Here is The Agitator’s most enduring tradition. For our 12th Christmas, and into our thirteenth year, we urge you to get into a mirthful holiday spirit by enjoying to this unforgettable rendition of O Holy […]

Learn More December 24, 2018

Let’s Get Small with Micromoments

When was the last time you wondered who that actress is and what you knew her from?  When that happened, were you content to just not know? No.  Not knowing is so 1990s.  And so are not comparison shopping, not buying, not receiving what you buy for weeks, not hearing about your donation, not being […]

Learn More December 21, 2018

Let’s Get Small With Impact

We have big missions.  End hunger.  Create a just society.  Save the whales.  But those aren’t the calls to action that make people give. First, we need a call to action that is about a unit – person, animal, or story.  Our behavioral science unit talks about the identifiable victim effect as one of a few […]

Learn More December 19, 2018

Sorry Santa, We’re Closed!

I never fail to marvel at the bizarre behavior of many nonprofits when it comes to year-end giving. Let me explain. For almost every charity the period between Christmas and New Year’s is a heavy period for giving. For some groups as much as 25% of their annual revenue arrives in those final weeks. Many donors—particularly […]

Learn More December 17, 2018

First, Do No Harm

A warning to those who have had a stillborn child – you may want to skip down to the bolded line below. Gillian Brockell had a tweet on Tuesday about grief and algorithms worth a read: An open letter to @Facebook, @Twitter, @Instagram and @Experian regarding algorithms and my son’s birth: pic.twitter.com/o8SuLMuLNv — Gillian Brockell […]

Learn More December 14, 2018

<< 1 … 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!