• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

When the Image Becomes the Ask

A set of experiments for a medical charity found people were more likely to choose campaigns with, Images showing visible illness and Group images instead of a single person. You probably think the first finding is akin to water being wet and are dubious of the 2nd one.  In both cases, the useful part is […]

Learn More June 12, 2026

Same Cause, Different Morality

Most fundraising appeals are written as if the moral case is obvious because, to the organization, it probably is. Here is the child, family, animal, veteran, patient, forest, student, or cause in need. Here is the donate button. Proceed directly to generosity. But that skips the part where the donor has to decide what kind […]

Learn More June 10, 2026

The Donor Hunger Games: May the Highest RFM Score Win

If people gave because we asked, one-size-fits-all fundraising would be the smartest system ever invented. Put the same appeals on the same calendar and dial up your activity to see generosity roll in.  The orginal sin is believing or at least behaving as if you belive asking = getting. Fundraising has two jobs: what we say […]

Learn More June 8, 2026

Your Gift String Should Not Need a User Manual

I got a cold text donation ask for Ukraine relief with this gift string: $120 repairs a damaged roof and broken windows $100 provides psychosocial counseling for one person $295 delivers emergency essentials to a family. There is a version of this that makes sense inside the organization. Someone probably had to get three different […]

Learn More June 5, 2026

Fundraising Keeps Asking Strangers to Act Like Supporters

If the list, offer and package are right, response will follow.  Sort of, sometimes, maybe. This fundraising holy trinity leaves out a tiny detail: whether people know who the hell you are.  That might sound obvious but obvious can be in limited supply. The chart shows acquisition analysis looking at how much mail went into […]

Learn More June 3, 2026

The Crusonia Donor

University of Chicago economist Frank Knight came up with a thought experiment called the Crusonia plant. It was a miraculous organism. You planted it once and it produced fruit year after year, without labor, maintenance, risk, depletion, or decay. It was meant to be absurd, using the Crusonia to imagine an asset whose value came […]

Learn More June 1, 2026

The Author Is Not to Be Informed

Memorandum To: The Book Launch Committee From: Department of Applied Fundraising Nonsense Re: Promotional strategy for The Volume Trap Classification: Sensitive, because the author is becoming difficult The committee has reviewed The Volume Trap and identified several promotion challenges. First, the book argues fundraising has scaled activity instead of understanding.  Second, it suggests more asking […]

Learn More May 29, 2026

13 Years and Still Explaining Basic Arithmetic to Boards

We’ve been writing about “cost of fundraising” as a deeply flawed metric since we launched The Agitator in 2013. Thirteen years. The argument hasn’t gotten more complicated and too many boards haven’t gotten smarter. Let’s try one more time. The Metric That Rewards Shrinking Cost of fundraising — expressed as cents raised per dollar spent, […]

Learn More May 27, 2026

Memorial Day: What We Owe the Young

  Look at any cemetery on Memorial Day, and you see a quiet sea of stone. But look closer, and you see the true weight of the day: it is a holiday paid for almost entirely by the young. For older generations, these rows of white markers evoke a sacred era of collective duty—a time […]

Learn More May 25, 2026

Your Vendor’s Dashboard Does Not Show the Donor’s Day

Yesterday was my lucky day, I received three cold MMS fundraising appeals from three different charities.   It was different sender numbers and causes but clearly the same basic machinery: image first text second “STOP to End” matching campaign-looking URLs, And in two cases, the chirpy little “Hi Kevin” that somehow manages to feel less personal […]

Learn More May 22, 2026

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 … 183 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!