• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Have we made ignoring the appeal effortless?

Past giving predicts future giving. That’s useful for deciding whom to ask, but it becomes circular when we mistake prediction for understanding. For this reason, I used to dismiss behavior beyond its predictive value but I overlooked an important mechanism: repetition in a familiar setting can make a response automatic. The chart shows why this […]

Learn More October 14, 2026

BEFORE YOU FINISH YOUR 2027 FUNDRAISING PLAN…

It’s that wonderful time of year again.  Somewhere, at this very moment,  amid the year-end scramble a fundraiser is opening the 2026 fundraising plan, changing the dates to 2027, adding 5% to the revenue goal, 7% to expenses, sprinkling some AI on top, and calling it strategic planning. Don’t.  The ground underneath fundraising is moving […]

Learn More October 12, 2026

Did You Choose For the Donor?

When was the last time you felt good about being lightly manipulated or guilted into something? Behavioral economics 101 emphasizes the power of defaults in steering behavior. Just check the box, circle, or highlight the option you want people to choose, and place it in the middle. These defaults are better described as choice robbers. […]

Learn More October 9, 2026

Five Cents for the Name. A Year to Find Out.

The acquisition model you rent names from is good at predicting response and lousy at growth. Co-op models start with recorded giving and rank people for near-term response. That supplies a useful but small and shrinking responder pool.  And what about people with mission fit and no giving record?  Never seen and therefore, never served […]

Learn More October 7, 2026

The Growth Your Acquisition Model Misses

Consider two pools of people: Group 1: People already visible in your donor-response universe. They give to you or other charities, and their giving history makes them easy for acquisition models to find and rank. Group 2: Additional people whose values and goals fit your mission. They sit outside your usual acquisition audience and may […]

Learn More October 5, 2026

The New Idea Doesn’t Need a Guarantee. The Old One Needs an Audit

Every new, innovative idea that walks into a nonprofit gets frisked at the door. The old ideas, practices, and ‘controls’ stroll right past security. Nobody asks them for ID. Barbara O’Reilly put her finger on the symptom in her latest Gut Check at Windmill Hill Consulting: “Why does everyone want constant innovation, but no one […]

Learn More October 2, 2026

Does Supporting Your Mission Require A Free Jacket?

Walt Kelly’s comic strip character, Pogo, gave us the line, “We have met the enemy and he is us.” In fundraising, the enemy often arrives bearing address labels and a complimentary jacket. In 2023, 60% of acquisition mail used premiums, another 28% used matching gifts or faux supporter cards, and just 12% was mission mail. […]

Learn More September 30, 2026

Every Board Member Has An Excuse.

Every fundraiser has heard some version of the board member excuse when it comes to raising money. “I don’t know anyone with money.” …“I’m a terrible salesman.”… “I already gave.” …“I’ll help right after the gala.” (The gala, like the horizon, keeps moving.) …“I’d rather write a check than ask for one.” ….“If I ask […]

Learn More September 28, 2026

729 Possible Packages. Somehow We Keep Mailing the Same One.

Ray Bradbury said, “Quantity produces quality. If you only write a few things, you’re doomed.” The Fundraising Volume Machine read that as permission to send more appeals and chase donors around the internet with a butterfly net. Bradbury meant creative production, not contact frequency. There are three very different kinds of quantity in fundraising: Quantity […]

Learn More September 25, 2026

Are You Building Bridges or Moats?

Your charity’s issue or area of focus needs oxygen, like a flame, to stay lit.  It requires exposure and active discourse to grow support and make material improvement against the problem. We’re all in the advocacy business.  But is your approach building a moat or a bridge? The organizations in the orange circles are moat builders, […]

Learn More September 23, 2026

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 … 188 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping

    • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
    • RSS Feed
    • We welcome your feedback!