• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Women are Special. Audit the Verbs.

Women are special. No shit, Sherlock. Let me rescue that lede before some earnest copywriter or designer buries it under a lavender color gradient, a stock photo of two beige hands clasped over a beige table, and a subject line that says “Together, We Rise.” Almost every fundraising appeal targeted to women that dies on […]

Learn More August 31, 2026

Repeat Giving Is an Outcome, Not a Habit

Your database knows a donor gave again but not whether she remembered why, responded automatically to the annual appeal, forgot about the monthly debit or was briefly unable to say no to a cheerful stranger in a branded vest. Your database is a security camera recording the behavior, not the motive. Volume Machine Fundraising (it’s […]

Learn More August 28, 2026

Twenty Years of Fundraising Experience or One Year Repeated 20x?

Would you rather take fundraising advice from a 28 yr old or 58? The older fundraiser probably gets the instinctive nod as 30 years in fundraising must have produced more knowledge than 8 yrs. But then come the qualifications like hiring the younger fundraiser to attract younger donors or operate whatever social platform appeared during […]

Learn More August 26, 2026

GOTV Works…Or Not

There was a field experiment using social pressure mailers that increased voter turnout by around 8 percentage points. That’s a massive lift. But averages, even big lift ones, can hide a lot.  Nothing works the same with everybody.  There aren’t universal “nudges” or other tactics that apply evenly to all people. To quote the late […]

Learn More August 24, 2026

What If Asking More Trains Donors to Give Less?

Ask more, make more is a very convenient theory of fundraising. At the campaign level, it often appears to work. Send another appeal and money comes back. Add another email and somebody clicks. Drop in an SMS and a few gifts appear. Revenue gets attributed to the contact, the spreadsheet turns green and the volume […]

Learn More August 21, 2026

Do You Have a Plan B for Your Payment Platform?

Here’s a question worth asking at your next staff meeting right after the digital guru finishes bragging about the online revenue numbers: if ActBlue stopped processing your donations tomorrow morning, what exactly would you do? Not what would you do next quarter, once someone convenes a task force. Not after the emergency call where somebody […]

Learn More August 17, 2026

Definitely Bold and Underline Fundraising Copy, Right?

There seems to be an article of faith in direct mail fundraising: bold and underline the important stuff. Do a Google search for fundraising copywriting advice and some version of the same rationale appears again and again. People don’t really read fundraising letters. They skim them. So bolding and underlining tell the donor what matters […]

Learn More August 14, 2026

Does Your Test Know What It’s Testing?

Before you run a fundraising test do you specify what behavior is supposed to change?  Is it response rate, average gift, maybe both? If you can’t answer that before the test goes out then that tells you something. That “something” usually shows up in the test results that report on response rate, average gift, revenue, […]

Learn More August 12, 2026

Tolstoy, Attrition and the Myth of the Average Donor

“All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” That is the opening line of Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina. He then spent more than 800 pages cataloguing the many available routes to domestic misery. Fundraising has adopted its own version of the Tolstoy principle: successful donor relationships all look roughly alike, […]

Learn More August 10, 2026

Your Database Knows the Gift But Does it Know the Donor?

Your database knows someone gave $43 at 9:17 p.m. after clicking an email on an iPhone. It may also know the campaign, payment method, landing page and which subject line got the click. That is a great deal of information about the transaction and very little about the person. We tend to collect what is […]

Learn More August 7, 2026

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 … 186 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping

    • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
    • RSS Feed
    • We welcome your feedback!