• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Donating Shouldn’t Require Target Practice

Your donor has decided to give but has your donation form decided to test their fine motor skills?  Somewhere between the tiny button and the accidental tap, a fundraising problem becomes a design problem. In 1954, psychologist Paul Fitts demonstrated a relationship that still matters to anyone building a donation page: smaller, farther targets take […]

Learn More November 4, 2026

Mobile Giving and the Department of Me

You hear “mobile optimization” and likely think make the text readable, shorten the form, enlarge the button.  But the device may also change what message works best. We’ve given considerably more thought to where the donor’s finger goes than where their attention goes. Our phones are highly personal possessions, holding conversations, photos, favorite music and […]

Learn More November 2, 2026

We Hired a Robot to Thank You. You’re Welcome.

Dear Mary, Thank you for your generous gift. We know how much this cause means to you as we remember your grandson’s illness, your family’s experience, and the extraordinary loyalty you’ve shown over the years. Your generosity means the world to us. With warmest personal regards, Your Development Director   Lovely note. Personal and heartwarming […]

Learn More October 30, 2026

Please Adjust Your Donors to Fit the Appeal

The Air Force built its cockpits around the average pilot. In 1950, it started collecting new measurements to update the design and the averages. A researcher, Gilbert Daniels, had a more fundamental question: how many pilots actually matched the average?  Zero out of 4,063. A pilot could be average height with long arms and short […]

Learn More October 28, 2026

We Asked, They Gave. We Learned the Wrong Lesson.

Fundraising has spent decades operating on a seductive assumption: Ask = Give. Send an appeal, money comes back, and the campaign gets credit. The problem is that some of those donors would have given anyway. Others simply gave today instead of next month. DonorVoice analyses suggest roughly two-thirds of the revenue from an additional appeal […]

Learn More October 26, 2026

Is More, Less Good?

Is your team – agency, charity, agency + charity – the right size?  Bigger isn’t better. There’s a strong tendency for individual members of a group to become increasingly less productive as the size of their group increases. This phenomenon occurs in rope pulling and the workplace, it’s called the Ringlemann effect. Ringlemann measured the […]

Learn More October 23, 2026

Forget A/B Testing

The winning version of a fundraising campaign can still leave you poorer than running no campaign at all. It’s a possibility the budget and campaign calendars are remarkably good at leaving out. We test the headline, photograph, envelope and ask string. Each new idea must prove it can beat the control, while the decision to […]

Learn More October 21, 2026

Don’t Blame It On the Election

The fundraising report arrives.  Revenue is below budget and new donors are scarce. Someone at the board meeting clears his throat. “It’s the election.” Heads nod, shoulders drop as folks relax. There it is: the explanation that asks nothing more of anyone.  Apparently, the candidates have vacuumed up every available dollar, leaving your food pantry, […]

Learn More October 19, 2026

Please Give Immediately. We’re Trying to Grow.

The Volume Machine of fundraising has developed a remarkably efficient way to make a large potential market look tiny: require everyone in it to be ready to donate before we agree they belong there. Then call whoever survives “the prospect universe.” That universe may be only a small sliver of the people whose values, identity […]

Learn More October 16, 2026

Have we made ignoring the appeal effortless?

Past giving predicts future giving. That’s useful for deciding whom to ask, but it becomes circular when we mistake prediction for understanding. For this reason, I used to dismiss behavior beyond its predictive value but I overlooked an important mechanism: repetition in a familiar setting can make a response automatic. The chart shows why this […]

Learn More October 14, 2026

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 … 189 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    • Commitment StudiesInsights Research
    • PreTest ToolInsights Research
    • Donor Feedback PlatformDonor Experience
    • Personality TagsPersonalized Matching
    • Personalized CadencePersonalized Matching
    • Acquisition 2.0Acquisition
    • Behavioral Science Audits & WorkshopsBehavioral Science Services
    See all products →

    No spam, ever. Promise.

    • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
    • RSS Feed
    • We welcome your feedback!