• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Is Your Acquisition Renting the Same Pond?

Fundraising has a vocabulary problem that turns into a measurement problem, which then turns into a strategy problem. First we use a word too loosely, then we build reports around it, then we manage to the report as if the word meant what we hoped it meant. “Acquisition” is one of those words. In most […]

Learn More May 20, 2026

Motion Is Not Progress. Ask Less. Ask Better.

I should confess my bias upfront: for 15 years, I’ve watched Kevin Schulman build DonorVoice from a contrarian idea into one of the most rigorous enterprises in nonprofit fundraising. Plus, he’s a partner in The Agitator and  a provocateur in the best sense,  He “occasionally” blames me for bringing him into this world of fundraising […]

Learn More May 18, 2026

Are You Necessary or Critical?

Necessary and critical are synonyms but not equal.  The former is more neutral, the latter more promotional, market-y. Which one should you use if you’re making a claim?  Research from the National Academy of Sciences analyzed over 10 years of grant applications and found that more promotional language increases grant success. The relationship is really […]

Learn More May 15, 2026

Headline: Volunteering is a gateway to giving.

Volunteering as gateway to increased giving, that feels wholesome and easily worthy of a conference keynote slide next to a stock photo of smiling people in matching t-shirts. This headline is from a large, randomized field experiment with nearly 150,000 people connected to a science/environment nonprofit.  The charity isn’t named but I infer it’s probably […]

Learn More May 13, 2026

A Field Report From Inside the Storm

Long before he helped launch and edit The Agitator, long before moving to New Zealand, and launching a magazine and newsletter named  BayBuzz, Tom Belford spent six years building and running Ted Turner’s Better World Society –the first philanthropic venture  aimed at using the then largely untapped power of television for social change. And the […]

Learn More May 11, 2026

When Asking for Money Makes People Stop Doing Good Things

Swedes are world-class recyclers, nearly 90% of bottles and cans get returned. It’s a habit and point of civic pride.  Then researchers added one small twist to the recycling machines: “Press here to get your deposit.”“Or press here to donate it to charity.” And the moment that donation choice appeared, recycling dropped and the drop persisted.  […]

Learn More May 6, 2026

The Manager Tax

A researcher at Strange Loop Canon ran an AI experiment with 15 tasks and three setups. An LLM model working alone. A “manager” model that split the work and delegated to AI specialist agents. And a market where models bid for the job and the best bid won. The manager cost four times more than […]

Learn More May 4, 2026

Engagement Is a Junk Drawer

The jangle fallacy is the assumption that two similar or identical things must be different because they wear different labels. Old wine in new bottles. Psychology coined the term, and psychology is where it does the most damage. A few of my favorites: Grit. In high school my kids were assigned the Duckworth book. Grit […]

Learn More May 1, 2026

When Authenticity Gets Lost In The Mail

I get it, you want engagement and donors to feel heard. And someone, somewhere convinced you that a faux-official looking survey with a registration number and a barcode was the way to do it. The only rub?  Your donors aren’t idiots.  We ran a study looking at donor reactions to these “surveys”.  You know the […]

Learn More April 29, 2026

The M+R Benchmarks Are In. The Numbers Are Whispering Something Most Fundraisers Don’t Want to Hear.

There’s a moment in every M+R Benchmarks Study when the room goes quiet. Not because the data is shocking, but because it confirms what many already know—and haven’t acted on. This year’s M+R Report doesn’t scream.   It sighs.  Growth… but bring a microscope Online revenue is up—sometimes sharply, depending on the slice of the data […]

Learn More April 27, 2026

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 … 182 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!