• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Democracy Doesn’t Need Your Talking Points. It Needs Your List.

     Somewhere in some nonprofit’s Slack channel right now, someone is drafting talking points on “the erosion of voting rights.” Somebody else is scheduling a panel: Protecting Democracy in the Midterms — A Conversation. Nobody in that channel has yet asked a single supporter to show up as a poll worker on November 3. […]

Learn More August 5, 2026

You Fixed the Metric but the Problem Moved

California banned thin plastic grocery bags. The number of those bags fell by roughly 40 million pounds a year. Look only at the checkout counter and the intervention worked beautifully. Shoppers, however, had been using some of those bags again. They lined small trash cans, handled pet waste, and performed the various grubby jobs for […]

Learn More August 3, 2026

Pretty Wins

Fundraising runs on numbers. We collect them, slice them, chart them and eventually put them in front of someone who is expected to make a decision. We like to imagine the data speaks for itself. Alas, it doesn’t.  Turns out the chart speaks too, and it has a loud voice. Research across topics, industries, media […]

Learn More July 31, 2026

The People Who Make It Happen

At this year’s Bridge Conference  you’ll hear a lot about ideas.  The big idea…the winning package…the breakthrough campaign…the creative that beat the control. You’ll hear about data and strategy and of course about artificial intelligence. And about major donors and monthly donors and lapsed donors and donors who gave once in 1997 and might, with […]

Learn More July 29, 2026

Did Your A/B Test Declare a Winner and Still Lose Money?

An A/B test feels scientific because it is.  The audience is randomly split, version A beats version B, some runs a stat sig test and voila, everyone gets A from now on. But what about the people that preferred B?  A 55% to 45% clear win still leaves plenty of people preferring B and getting […]

Learn More July 27, 2026

Your Donor Is Not a Delivery Truck

Defining donors by channel is a bit like defining me by whether Amazon, USPS, UPS or FedEx delivers my packages. It’s accurate, objective and almost entirely inconsequential to what I bought or why. Calling someone an online donor makes the same mistake. The donor may have seen a piece of mail, passed a billboard, heard […]

Learn More July 24, 2026

Lunch Isn’t Free, Nor is Email

How many of you have read performance reports where the email cost is $0?   Does anyone else find zero cost to be silly? A study analyzed 746,426 email solicitations sent to 21,451 online survey panelists over three years.  The modeled out 3 possible explanations for attrition: people never permanently disengage people disengage as time passes […]

Learn More July 22, 2026

Make Them Look, Then Make Them Leave

One identifiable person, visible need, tight crop, visceral with a direct gaze and set of eyeballs that can follow the donor all the way to the reply device.   This seems defensible, more visible suffering creates more attention, more emotion and therefore more giving. But does this neat, tidy advice treat three different behaviors as if […]

Learn More July 17, 2026

Strategy Is Whatever Gets a Row

Does this look familiar?  Spring Appeal. Summer Appeal. Fall Appeal. Year End.  Then the channels are added underneath. Direct mail, email, digital, phone. This uber common way of organizing the world is a major decision point that was probably decided by default, by habit.  What’s the strategic unit?  With this approach, it’s the campaign. All the rich […]

Learn More July 15, 2026

Donor Horoscopes

  I enjoy mocking generational marketing.  You know the genre; Boomers are loyal, Millennials want meaning, Gen Z wants authenticity, TikTok, and oat-milk. But that doesn’t mean birth cohort tells us nothing. There are three things that get lazily shoved into the same generational bucket. An age effect is what happens because people get older. Risk-taking tends […]

Learn More July 13, 2026

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 … 186 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping

    • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
    • RSS Feed
    • We welcome your feedback!