• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Does Your A/B Test Have a People Problem?

“If only we could get more people to give…” “If only we could get more people to give and do so more regularly.” “Let’s devise a test.” The HiPPO doesn’t hesitate. “More people will give if we change the landing page. Less text. Or more text. Fewer fields. We should test that.” “Great,” says someone […]

Learn More April 3, 2026

Is Your AI Strategy Your Spreadsheet Strategy With Better Hair?

Gurus and detailed lore plus an unshakable conviction that the way the world works can now be understood, and reshaped, by those who’ve mastered the new tool.   You’ve seen the discourse. You know the feeling: real excitement, and a nagging suspicion that more than a few people are performing understanding rather than demonstrating it. AI?  […]

Learn More April 1, 2026

A 37-Item Packing List, Ten-Toed Socks, and One Very Good Reason to Give

Ken Burnett — for those who’ve somehow missed the last 40 years of fundraising civilization — is walking 500 miles across Spain. Again. He did this five years ago for SOFII, the Showcase of Fundraising Innovation and Inspiration. He raised £21,000. He is now, by his own admission, “five years older and more than a […]

Learn More March 27, 2026

Zelensky Has Better Donor Data Than You Do

There’s a stack of direct mail somewhere in America right now — a #10 envelope with carrier teaser, a 4-page letter, a reply device, a return envelope — traveling toward a donor who gave $25 last August. The organization spent more producing it than they will ever see back. Nobody decided this. It just keeps […]

Learn More March 25, 2026

Early, Often… and Overrated: More on the Second Gift Myth

Solicitation frequency.  Not exactly cocktail party conversation but conversation starter nevertheless.  Here is a look at 3 organizations, 7 full years of giving, all reglious, and all mailing a lot, I mean a lot; 30-50 times a year, not a typo. To restate, much conventional wisdom rests on these two points Get the second gift […]

Learn More March 23, 2026

Your Second Gift Data Is Lying To You

There’s a finding that circulates enough in fundraising circles that it’s treated as established fact: donors who receive a second ask within 30 days of their first gift give again at much higher rates than those who wait five weeks or more. The implied takeaway is straightforward; ask again quickly, capture the momentum. Except the […]

Learn More March 20, 2026

When the Close Up Image Doesn’t Work

Hopeful or sad for your appeal?  It sounds like a practical choice, which is probably why it sticks around. But it pushes into the wrong level of thinking by assuming emotion is a dial you adjust independently as single variable when instead, it’s more of a holistic, gut level reaction. How many appeals are you […]

Learn More March 18, 2026

The Charity Image That Quietly Signals Agency

Same hands, same object being transferred, same charitable context; just a small shift in vertical position. On the left, the donor’s hand sits below the recipient’s, on the right, it’s above. Donors donated more in a split test when the donor’s hand appeared higher in the frame.  The reason is straightforward, humans interpret vertical space […]

Learn More March 16, 2026

“Experiencing Homelessness” and Other Ways We Talk Past People

Concrete, precise, and specific language makes donors feel heard. Wharton’s Jonah Berger and York University’s Grant Packard analyzed customer service interactions to understand what moves customer satisfaction.  It wasn’t compensation, tone, or empathy training, it was word choice. Increasing linguistic concreteness by one standard deviation improved customer satisfaction by 9% and actual spending by 13%. […]

Learn More March 13, 2026

The Dead Man Who Knows More About Fundraising Than You Do

Let me tell you about Lyman Pierce. He raised the equivalent of $5 billion before anyone had heard of a CRM. He invented the capital campaign, the gift table, the volunteer team structure, and the daily accountability report — then in 1940 he died and was largely forgotten. HOWEVER…he  left behind a fundraising manual that […]

Learn More March 11, 2026

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 … 181 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!