• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Generation AA – The Battery of Social Change

I made a big mistake; I’d like to remedy it with my blog post today. On our webinar about segmentation last week (which is archived here), Kevin and I argued that demographics are a poor way of segmenting your file.  This is because they are not predictive, have far more differences within demographic groups than […]

Learn More April 12, 2018

Alexa, Please Save a Life

Last Monday, Amazon announced that Echo with Alexa will now allow you to donate to one of 48 charities with voice commands.  They also said this list will continue to grow.  (Of course it will; Amazon has thousands of charities signed up with their payment info through Amazon Smile.) Some important things to know: You […]

Learn More

The Ripple Effect – A Large Donation Shows Two Trends at Work

FUNDRAISING BULLETIN! “An enterprise blockchain cryptocurrency company just funded every classroom project request on DonorsChoose.org.” Yes, I realize that half of that sentence wouldn’t have made a bit of sense five years ago.  It may not even make full sense now.  So let’s break it down. Ripple is the name of the enterprise blockchain solutions […]

Learn More April 11, 2018

Doing Good While Doing Harm

This afternoon Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg will testify before a joint session of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee on the company’s recent Cambridge Analytica privacy scandal, in which personal data from some 50 million ,87million, maybe far far more million users ended up in the hands of an outside research […]

Learn More April 10, 2018

Stuck On the Bottom Line

Why, for nearly six decades, has American philanthropy failed to grow beyond a 2% share of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP)? After all, decade after decade athletes break new records, horses run faster, crop yields bloom with increases and on and on.  But since 1970 American philanthropic giving has stayed stuck; the percentage of GDP […]

Learn More April 9, 2018

Segmenting Your Donor Services

Every donor is worthy of respect.  After all,  not everyone gives of themselves to help others. Every dollar given is a sacrifice.  Even if given with not-wholly-pure motives like tax benefits or looking good to others, a dollar to charity is a dollar not spent on the hedonic or the temporary. And yet, for charities, […]

Learn More April 6, 2018

Mayfly marketing

Mayflies wait an entire year waiting to be born.  On the day of their birth, they fly off, find a mate, lay eggs, and die.  All in one day. This feels like the modern marketing landscape.  Our windows of relevance in the media and of opportunity with donors seem so fleeting. I have bad news: […]

Learn More April 5, 2018

(Lack of) Speed Kills

When Amazon started, people were nervous about providing  a credit card number in hope that their books would arrive. (Don’t @ me, 25-and-unders, this was a real thing.)  Will my book arrive?  Will it be what I intended?  Is this whole Internet thing a scam? So a large part of Amazon’s infrastructure works to convince […]

Learn More

The Neuroscience of Donor Services

Why do we care about donor service?  Let’s delve into our donors’ brains to find out. You!  Put down that hacksaw!  I was speaking metaphorically! Picture any decision you make as a debate between “pull towards” and “push away.”  The pull comes from our nucleus accumbens.  The nucleus accumbens – think of this as your […]

Learn More April 4, 2018

The Value of “Random Amazement”

This week Nick and I deal with the critically important function of “Donor Service.” Let’s start with this fundamental question:  Do you really know what good donor service looks like? I sure hope so, because as we’ve reported before, nearly 20% of all donors who drop out quit because of lousy donor service. Consequently, any […]

Learn More April 3, 2018

<< 1 … 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!